OBAMA’s WAR on AMERICA

OBAMA’s WAR on AMERICA

My Friends: We live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you will join with me as we try to change it”

Barak Obama

Yes I can lie and say “I think the vast majority of Americans know that we’re trying hard, that I want what’s best for the country.” The truth is my approval rating fell to 44 percent in the latest CBS News Poll, the lowest level of my tenure in office.

Those that agree with and side with BO are traitors toAmericajust like he is and should be tried as such in a court of law. His plan is purposeful and dangerous toAmericaand all freedom loving Americans. Notice in his quote he acknowledgesAmericais great, but then notice that he wants to change it. Now why would any freedom loving American want to change this country into something other than a beacon of life, hope and freedom for the entire world to see?

His actions are on purpose to destroyAmericaand help ushering in one world order. Look at the recent disaster in the gulf. He wants it to get worse so he can extort more money out of the big bad capitalist oil company. He wants higher gas prices so all of Americans can suffer with higher gas prices and adverse economic impact. He does not wantAmericato succeed inAfghanistanenacting stupid rules of engagement that prevent our soldiers from killing the enemy and giving the enemy the opportunity to kill our men in combat.

He wants higher taxes and high unemployment so the crisis will not go to waste. Dodd recently stated we have a crisis and had to act and pass another 2,000 page bill that no-one has read to enforce more control over banks and the American people.

See it is not about compassion but control, taking away liberty, freedom and replacing it with a socialist state. My bashAmericatour was sending a message to the world that I am now in charge and you can expect to see changes like usingUStax dollars to fund abortions around the world, redistribution of wealth, a weakenedUSmilitary, a weakenedUSeconomy and dollar and subsequent control of the American people.

I said in my book “I will stand with the Muslims if the winds of politics shift in the wrong direction. Have I not dome that while President as I give rights to terrorists and free lawyers and give orders not to use words such as Islamic Extremist or terrorist and lie about theFortHoodshooter. You see America I am a Muslim and will do my best to destroy America and you can see I have been quite successful in less than 2 years in office as we continue our all out assault on America, liberty and freedom.

Remember I am the guy who said during the campaign that our military was air raiding villages killing innocent women and children. Now how can someone who says something like that want our military to succeed? Well I do not want to win the war on Muslims terrorist. But I do want to wage war onAmerica.

Barak ( Narcissist ) Obama.

WhatAmericaneeds now is a man like Thomas Jefferson

When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.

Thomas Jefferson

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.

Thomas Jefferson ( Jump ahead to 2011- 33-35% of Americans receive government handouts)

It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.

Thomas Jefferson  ( Jump ahead to 2011USAin debt for $14.5 trillion and counting)

I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.

Thomas Jefferson  ( Jump ahead to 2011 Obamacare advancing forward, 34% of Americans receive government assistance/handouts)

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.

Thomas Jefferson ( Jump ahead to 2011, Does anyone in their right mind believeAmericahas a small government?)

No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.

Thomas Jefferson ( Jump ahead to 2011. Right to Bear Arms is under siege daily from the established elitist inAmerica)

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

Thomas Jefferson ( Jump ahead to 2011, The US Government has become a Nazi state, Obamacare is just the beginning )

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

Thomas Jefferson

( Jump ahead to 2011 The US Government wants to control every aspect of your life from health care, telling you what to eat, regulate the internet, lector us that bullying is wrong buts lets union thugs and the new black panthers intimidate and hurt people, will not let companies drill for oil and natural gas in America, that is plentiful, but wants to put up more windmills and build trains. )

To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.

Thomas Jefferson

( Jump ahead to 2011, Using tax payer dollars to support abortions in the US and world wide, teaching public school children that homosexuality is OK and giving out condoms to elementary school children)

Thomas  Jefferson said in 1802:

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.  If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property – until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.

( Jump ahead to 2011, The US Government printing money we do not have and bailing out banks and businesses )

President  Bush – Miss Me Yet

Obama: Yes I am the the Hindu deity,   Lord Shiva.

======================================================

MY STUPID ENERGY Policy _ I call it MY WAR on ENERGY INDEPENDENCE

 Yes I love higher gas prices. Americans are stupid to want affordable gas

Rising oil prices beginning to hurt US economy

Just when companies have finally stepped up hiring, rising oil prices are threatening to halt theU.S.economy’s gains. Some economists are scaling back their estimates for growth this year, in part because flat wages have left households struggling to pay higher gasoline prices. Oil has topped $108 a barrel, the highest price since 2008. Regular unleaded gasoline now goes for an average $3.69 a gallon, according to AAA’s daily fuel gauge survey, up 86 cents from a year ago.

STAY home America, you do not deserve a vacation. Yes Michelle we are going back to Hawaii, remember I won and those extremist can cling to their guns and religion.

 Hey Americans how do you like those high gasoline prices? We are not drilling. Put up more windmills. Fossil fuels are of the past, trains and windmills are in.

Gas prices jumped over the weekend to a new nationwide average of $3.37 a gallon — 26.7 cents a gallon more than a month ago. Food prices in January rose at the fastest since the fall of 2008.

I love HOPE AND CHANGE. That is what you get America a little change in your pocket and I am going to get that with my new tax on the internet.

Since Barack Obama Has Taken Office, Gasoline Prices Have More Than Doubled With No Relief In Sight For Americans

Gasoline Prices Have Doubled Since Obama Took Office. “Feeling pain at the pump? Gas prices have doubled since Mr. Obama took office.” (James S. Robbins, “Gasoline Up 100% Under Obama,” The Washington Times’ “Water Cooler” Blog, 3/30/11) 

  • Gas Price Hikes      Are “Relentless.” “The relentless rise in retail gasoline prices      continued over the last week, the U.S. Energy Department said, with some      analysts predicting that fuel prices could test record highs.” (Ronald D.      White, “Gasoline Prices Climb In California      And The Nation,” Los      Angeles Times, 4/19/11)

The Average American Household Will Spend At Least $700 More On Gasoline In 2011, Increasing Motor Fuel Expenses By At Least 28 Percent. “The average U.S. household will spend about $700 more for gasoline in 2011 than it spent last year, bringing total motor fuel expenses up 28 percent to $3,235, based on an annual pump price of $3.61 a gallon, the department’s Energy Information Administration said.”(Tom Doggett, “Gasoline Cost To Jump $700 For Average Household,” Reuters, 3/9/11)

OBAMA’S “SOLUTIONS” RANGE FROM RIDICULOUS TO RECYCLED

Obama’s Solution For Pain At The Pump? Trade In Your Car

Obama Needled A Questioner About Gas Prices, Suggesting The Individual Should Trade In His Car If He Was Only Getting 8 Miles Per Gallon.  “Obama needled one questioner who asked about gas prices, now averaging close to $3.70 a gallon nationwide, and suggested that the gentleman consider getting rid of his gas-guzzling vehicle. ‘If you’re complaining about the price of gas and you’re only getting 8 miles a gallon, you know,’ Obama said laughingly. ‘You might want to think about a trade-in.’” (Darlene Superville, “Obama: Expect Little Short-Term Relief On Gas Prices,” The Associated Press, 4/6/11)

  • NOTE: The      Questioner Has Ten Kids In His Family, Requiring A Van. OBAMA:      “If you’re complaining about the price of gas and you’re only getting      eight miles a gallon — (laughter) — you may have a big family, but it’s      probably not that big.  How many you have?  Ten kids, you      say?  Ten kids?  (Laughter.)  Well, you definitely need a      hybrid van then.  (Laughter.)” (President Barack Obama, Remarks      At Town Hall, Fairless Hills, PA, 4/6/11)

Obama’s Solution? Recycle 2008 Campaign Idea And Go After Speculators

2011: “President Barack Obama On Tuesday Blamed Speculators For Driving Gasoline Prices Higher And Straining American Consumers, Saying There Was Enough Oil In World Markets To Meet Demand.” (Jeff Mason, “Obama Blames Speculators For Rising Fuel Prices,” Reuters, 4/19/11)

  • Obama:      “The problem is, is that oil is sold on these world markets, and      speculators and people make various bets, and they say, you know what, we think that maybe      there’s a 20 percent chance that something might happen in the Middle East      that might disrupt oil supply, so we’re going to bet that oil is going to      go up real high. And that spikes up prices significantly.” (Barack Obama, Remarks      At Northern Virginia Community College,Annandale, VA, 4/19/11)

2008: Obama Suggested Going After Oil Speculators To Ease Gasoline Prices. “Senator Barack Obama on Sunday proposed tightening the regulation of oil speculators in an effort to ease record high gasoline prices and address one of Americans’ top concerns.” (Brian Knowlton, “To Ease Gas Prices, Obama Eyes Speculators,” The New York Times, 6/23/08)

  • The Wall Street      Journal’s Washington Wire: “Obama Takes Aim At Energy      Speculators.” (“Obama Takes Aim At Energy Speculators,” The      Wall Street Journal’s “Washington      Wire” Blog, 6/22/08)

Another Obama Solution From The Archives: Inflate Your Tires!
Yes I can have the EPA tell Shell Oil you can not drill off the coast ofAlaska. Now why would Shell want to drill unless there was oil there that could help increase the supply and drive gas prices down.   I want Americans to suffer and remember this is all Bush’s fault.

Yes I can badger my opponents with comments such as this:

In a statement issued on June 17, 2008, Obama attacked his Republican opponent John McCain for his call to open the nation’s coastline for oil exploration and drilling. He also charged that McCain had flip-flopped on his support of a moratorium on drilling he expressed in 2000.

“John McCain’s support of the moratorium on offshore drilling during his first presidential campaign was certainly laudable, but his decision to completely change his position and tell a group ofHoustonoil executives exactly what they wanted to hear today was the sameWashingtonpolitics that has prevented us from achieving energy independence for decades,” Obama said.

“It’s another example of short-term political posturing from Washington, not the long-term leadership we need to solve our dependence on oil.”

Obama also said offshore drilling would not produce any oil for at least a decade, and the effect on gasoline prices would be negligible.

Three days later, Obama said during a campaign stop inJacksonville,Fla., according to the St. Petersburg Times: “The politics may have changed, but the facts haven’t. Offshore drilling would not lower gas prices today. It would not lower gas prices tomorrow. It would not lower gas prices this year. It would not lower gas prices five years from now.”

And

Yes I can lie and announce a five-year plan that includes opening up waters along portions of theU.S.mainland andAlaskafor oil exploration.

“Given our energy needs, in order to sustain economic growth and produce jobs, and keep our businesses competitive, we are going to need to harness traditional sources of fuel even as we ramp up production of new sources of renewable, homegrown energy,” he said.  “So today we’re announcing the expansion of offshore oil and gas exploration.”

The truth isAmericaI do not plan to expand offshore oil and gas exploration. There are so many contingencies and disclaimers that we will never, never, ever accomplish anything on my watch, but the Russians will as they are now the largest world producer of oil.

Yes I can have the EPA actually announce a contest with cash prizes paid for with your tax dollars for the best videos celebrating how great federal regulations are for Americans.  Click here for the EPA’s news release.   Take a quick look.

Please click here to urge your senators to vote YES on the Murkowski Resolution to stop the EPA power grab.

Yes I can tell the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set new regulations covering vehicle efficiency. I call it my “SAVE a TREE, Kill a DRIVER PROGRAM”. The new rule requires that United States cars and light trucks meet an average fuel-economy standard of 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016.  To meet the EPA’s new standard average, new-vehicle prices will rise by an additional $1,100 between now and 2016. It is just further evidence that going green is neither cheap nor easy. In fact it turns out to be a killer.  HEY AMERICA, GOING GREEN IS GOING TO COST YOU MONEY!

And

A report produced last summer by the Obama administration’s own National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) underscored that while clap-trap cars get better gas mileage, occupants are more likely to die in accidents. The fatality rate in small cars is twice that of larger cars. By NHTSA’s cold calculations an additional 493 Americans will die each year. It seems that the big wigs in Washingtoncan live with this since everything from the presidential limousine to cabinet staff cars are going to remain big and, oh yes, gasoline powered. It’s a policy of: “Save a tree, kill a driver.”

Yes I can Stall Baby Stall, not drill baby drill.  My offshore oil drilling proposal has not spurred North American oilmen to roll out the oil rigs. Executives in the industry are skeptical of a plan that is rife with challenges and chockfull of regulatory hoops.

Consider theAtlanticCoast. A previously planned lease sale off theVirginiacoast will go forward, but not until 2012 and only then if it passes review under the National Environmental Policy Act. Furthermore, public meetings will be held on all affected coastal areas this summer to set up Environmental Impact Studies. They will take at least a year. If that goes well then there will be a three month public comment period. Then more analyses and finally—yes finally—an impact statement sent to the Secretary of the Interior. And if the Greens don’t like what the secretary has to say they can go to court. As you can see, the red tape is certain to stretch further than the wells themselves.

Meanwhile, drilling along the ripe west coast and the plum parts of Alaska—regions that Congress approved in 2008—are now off limits.  Hey consider this pay back for giving us SARAH!

Yes I can giveAmericamy energy dependent plans. If you think that petroleum’s importance will soon be diminished by my Green Revolution, a story out ofTexasshould give you pause.

According to the April 5 issue of Texas Watchdog, “If the people ofBedford,Texas, are still borrowing whatever they are calling books in 72 years, they may find themselves in the public library on the very day the energy saved by the library’s planned solar power system finally equals the cost to build it.”

Things are even better forAustinCommunity College. The college, with the help of Federal stimulus dollars, can equip two of its campuses with solar energy. The savings commence in 2062!

So far 32 projects inTexashave been given stimulus dollars by the State Energy Conservation Office. They are 80 percent paid for by taxpayers.Texasalone has locked in $290 million Federal tax dollars for green energy programs via the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

So far the Federal government has set aside $17 billion for the Department of Energy to waste money on things like solar power inTexas. Instead of lending money for things that might pay off during the next ice age the government should be selling offshore oil leases.

Yes I can stop drilling and makeAmericamore dependent on foreign oil and drive up gasoline prices for all Americans.

Yes I can use the tragic BP oil spill as an excuse to push my radical Cap-and-Trade energy tax on the American people. Cap-and-Trade energy tax will likely increase gas prices to $6 or $7 per gallon, drive utility bills for Americans through the roof, kill jobs by the tens-of-thousands and further erode our personal freedoms.

Yes I can tax energy to drive up cost for Americans. “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees” at all times.

The President’s senior advisors agree:

  • Treasury Secretary Geithner said, “[increasing] the cost of energy… is necessary if you’re going to change how people use energy.”
  • Office of Management and Budget Director Orszag testified that price increases would encourage people and businesses “to make investments and behavioral changes that reduced CO2 emissions.”

Yes I can eliminate jobs inAmericaduring my summer of vacations by my moratorium on jobs.

My moratorium on new deepwater drilling is choking off economic development in theGulf of Mexico. These over-reaching regulations have halted drilling not only in deepwater, but also in shallow waters in the Gulf, off the coast ofAlaska, and even on existing platforms off the coast ofCalifornia. But the Gulf has borne the brunt of the economic hardship.

Learn more about the protests and the Administration’s ongoing moratorium and its effect on jobs at Save US Energy Jobs.

Yes I can  increase your utility bills and raise the price of gasoline. My “energy plan” will cap CO2 emissions and levy new taxes to be paid by the American people. Proponents of the bill will be careful to not call it “Cap & Trade”, but the name change is nothing but political gamesmanship.

In fact, the goal of this legislation is increased prices. Proponents hope that by increasing the cost of energy, Americans will use less. But as we struggle to overcome an economic crisis, now is not the time for new taxes and government-forced energy inflation.

Yes I can stop offshore drilling. Louisiana Sen. David Vitter on Sunday warned that the Obama administration’s offshore drilling moratorium could end up costing more jobs than the BP oil spill.

The Republican senator, one of several local officials who’s been outspoken in opposition to the suspension on Gulf drilling, told “Fox News Sunday” that 140,000 jobs or more are on the line as the administration continues to fight for a six-month drilling ban.

Yes I can put my thumb in your eye. Consider these new thumb-in-the-eye regulatory initiatives by the Obama Administration:

  • The Obama EPA has nationalized the permitting process for all new energy-related construction projects. This major power grab was objected to by only 14 states. Despite the GOP coming to power, all of them have backed down except forTexas, notes the December 30 edition of Investors.com.
  • On December 23, the Interior Department issued Secretarial Order 3310 giving itself more power to end energy development on all public lands.

HEY AMERICA, I’ll let you in on a little Secret. I CHEATED TO WIN AND I WAS NOT born in America. Remember those black panther dudes in PA, they worked for me.

===========================================================

My WAR on WALL STREET

Yes I can lie about my so-called financial reform bill and say my opponents are on the side of the big banks.  But in fact the big banks are on my side.  The Center for Responsive Politics (CRL) reports Wall Street has given 63 percent of its political contributions this cycle to Democrats, up from 57 percent in 2008.

Employees of scandal-plagued Goldman Sachs have given 69 percent of their political contributions this cycle to Democrats, only slightly down from 2008, when they gave 75 percent to Democrats — including nearly a million dollars to Barack Obama and $112,400 to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd. (Dodd is retiring instead of facing voters because of his own involvement in a housing-related scandal, a sweetheart loan Countrywide gave him.)

Bank stocks went up after Obama’s speech yesterday – probably because his bill institutionalizes “too big to fail.”  It doesn’t break up the banks and it assures them access to Federal Reserve loans as needed.  It makes bailouts permanent.

Yes I can say Now, what we’re doing, I want to be clear, we’re not trying to push financial reform because we begrudge success that’s fairly earned. I mean, I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money.” President Barack Obama went to Wall Street last month to champion his cause for financial regulation. Fresh from his healthcare victory the President seems itching for another fight.

Meanwhile the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced fraud charges against Goldman Sachs, arguing that the firm had committed fraud in structuring and selling its debt obligations. This has Congressman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) raising troubling questions.

Yes I can demand a pound of flesh. According to the The Independent, “This [the fight with Goldman Sachs[ has become the greatest battle between the American government and a private firm since President Franklin Roosevelt took on the ‘House of Morgan’ in the 1930s.” Obama has stylized himself as a New Deal President the likes of FDR. A couple of months ago Obama denounced “fat-cat bankers” for rewarding themselves bonuses after being saved by government bailouts. “Shameful,” he said. In fact, this President sounds much like FDR, who in 1936 denounced Wall Street for its “financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking,” and who fueled his fight by saying: “I welcome their hatred.”

Yes I can reverse the course set by Ronald Reagan, a man who brought a tidal wave of deregulation and with it, unprecedented economic prosperity. Under my command theU.S.is veering hard to the Left, a destination that will allow less freedom while creating bigger government. And oh yes, I am also packing the Supreme Court.

“The nanny state is smothering us all,” wrote the Ukiah Daily Journal. “The economic financial crisis which is upon us is being deliberately made worse (or at least being deliberately caused to continue) in order to be used as one excuse to turn theU.S. into a socialist state. If you don’t believe this, stay tuned, because you have been overwhelmed by the lies and myths.”

Yes I can create the largest debt in American history helping to bankruptAmerica.

As Congress continues to squabble over the budget and the federal government moves infinitely closer to reaching the debt ceiling, America received another wake-up call: Standard and Poor (S&P) has downgraded its outlook on the U.S. credit rating from “stable” to “negative” because of President Obama and Sen. Harry Reid’s inability to address the ever-growing debt and deficit.

There are only so many indicators that prove raising taxes and creating more social programs will not solveAmerica’s debt crisis–unemployment continues to hover around 9.2%, the housing market is still down, and the dollar is weak.

America’s economic future should not be the partisan issue it has become. Last fall, Americans overwhelmingly voted for fiscal responsibility and smaller government. House Republicans have delivered this, but the President and his allies in the Senate have put up roadblocks at every turn. It took four months for Congress to pass a budget for the remainder of 2011. And that budget simply kicked the can down the road, making our work on the 2012 budget that much more important.

We can’t ignore the facts before us. The President and Democratic Senate have reaffirmed their commitment to continue their reckless spending spree.

======================================================

My HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA – I call it MY WAR ON AMERICAN FAMILIES & Traditional Marriage Between a Man & Woman

Yes I can  Force Homosexual Marriage on all 50 States.

My Administration ordered the Justice Department to stop defending the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA] which prohibits homosexual “marriage” and defines traditional marriage between one man and one woman.  All 50 states will soon be forced to welcome homosexual “marriage” in federal court, unless their individual members of Congress intervene.  The Hill newspaper reports U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder left open the possibility that individual Congressmen would be permitted to defend DOMA law, if they choose to join lawsuits in place of the Obama Administration.

I LOVE THIS GUY. KISS ME MAN! GO FOR IT!  I Love Homosexuals. Call me, you can see one of my best friends below. Do not worry Michelle is off telling Americans what they can not eat.

Associated Press reports, “In a major policy reversal, the BO administration said Wednesday it will no longer defend the constitutionality of a federal law banning recognition of same-sex marriage.  Attorney General Eric Holder said BO has concluded that the administration cannot defend the federal law that defines marriage as only between a man and a woman.”

At a December news conference, BO said his position on gay marriage is “constantly evolving.”  [It’s not evolving.  He wants gay marriage.]  But Traditional Values Coalition Director Andrea Lafferty said, “This unprecedented power grab demands the immediate reaction of the United States House of Representatives, who must do everything possible to fight back against what can only be described as a despotic and alarming attack on the rule of law.”

Congress has authority to defend traditional marriage DOMA lawsuits if the President won’t.  Will your Congressman defend traditional marriage?  Let’s ask them. Call 202-225-3121, and then let’s bury them all in fax paper.

Please select here to SIGN NEW, URGENT PETITION to DEFEND MARRIAGE AND DOMA IN COURT, and STOP ENDORSING HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE, and we will auto-fax your petition to all 535 Senators and Congressmen (saving you much time!)

YES I AM THE FATTEST, UGLIEST GAYEST MAN IN WASHINGTON AND I LOVE IT AND I LOVE THOSE IDIOT PEOPLE WHO KEEP VOTING ME IN EVEN AS I CONTINUE TO SIN.  Give me another donut Johnny and do not forget the tea.

The Justice Department had defended the act in court until now.  The move quickly drew praise from homosexual Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA)–> who told TPM news:  “It’s great news…I got some indication they were thinking about their position and I urged them to go ahead with it. I thought there would be no political problem.”

Yes I can sign into law the Homosexual Classrooms Act . It contains a laundry list of anti-family provisions that will:

*** Require schools to teach appalling homosexual acts so “homosexual students” don’t feel “singled out” during already explicit sex-ed classes;

*** Spin impressionable students in a whirlwind of sexual confusion and misinformation, even peer pressure to “experiment” with the homosexual “lifestyle;”

*** Exempt homosexual students from punishment for propositioning, harassing, or even sexually assaulting their classmates, as part of their specially-protected right to “freedom of self-expression;”

I just love that part, because when I had the stop bullying summit in March 2011 I did not mean that homos could not harass straight kids.

*** Force private and even religious schools to teach a pro-homosexual curriculum and purge any reference to religion if a student claims it creates a “hostile learning environment” for homosexual students.

Yes I can support the Homosexuals. As my administration announced Wednesday that it will no longer defend the federal law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.

The decision marks a significant about-face for the Obama Justice Department, which until now had defended the law in court despite President Obama’s misgivings with the policy. The administration’s attorneys as recently as last month had filed a court motion in support of the Defense of Marriage Act, which effectively bans recognition of same-sex marriage. But after two new lawsuits were filed inNew YorkandConnecticut, Obama ordered Attorney General Eric Holder not to defend the statute.

SO TAKE THAT YOU CHRISTIANS as I Love the Homosexuals and I love Homosexual parades.

Yes I can pay back the Homosexual lobby

Included in the soaring costs associated with my Obamacare is exorbitant Homosexual Lifestyle Subsidies from special tax breaks to paying for HIV/AIDS treatment.

My Obamacare gives homosexual “couples” tax breaks not granted even to long-married traditional families.

In fact, it even imposes crippling marriage fines!

Top legal experts have determined that this healthcare bill will create a tax penalty of up to $10,680 a year per traditional family …

and at the same time homosexuals will be given a $1,069 annual bonus for living together in sin.

But as if this bonus for homosexual couples wasn’t bad enough, the bill also targets children for special pro-homosexual education programs starting in elementary school.

It’s a radical sex-ed program called the “Personal Responsibility and Education Program” designed to “consider the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth” — basically explicit training sessions on depraved homosexual sex acts.

Under the shameless guise of keeping children “safe,” elementary school teachers will be forced to promote and celebrate risky and repulsive homosexual behavior as “normal.”

Not only will Sodomy Training Seminars invade our schools, but government healthcare would force healthy Americans like you and me to pay for the treatment of infected homosexuals.

HIV treatments, AIDS medications, and the whole slew of Sexually Transmitted Infections that plague the homosexual lifestyle.

HEY AMERICA I WON AND I LOVE THE HOMOSEXUALS

Yes I can Appoint a Radical Homosexual Activist to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Nominated back in September, Chai R. Feldblum was still awaiting Senate confirmation until this last Saturday when Obama bypassed normal procedure by making her one of 15 recess appointments.

Feldblum is a longtime homosexual rights activist having worked for the Human Rights Campaign, founded the Moral Values Project (a homosexual rights group), authored several books pushing the Homosexual Agenda and was the lead drafter of the Gay Bill of Special Rights (Employment Non-Discrimination Act).

Feldblum holds radical viewpoints on the rights of private businesses to operate as they fit. In an article entitled Moral Conflict and Liberty: Gay Rights and Religion, she states that:

“…once a religious person or institution enters the stream of commerce by operating an enterprise such as a doctor’s office, hospital, bookstore, hotel, treatment center and so on, I believe the enterprise must adhere to a norm of nondiscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.”

Making this radical homosexual activist an influential government administrator is clearly a payback to the Homosexual Lobby.

Yes I can appease my homosexual base ahead of the midterm elections, by nominating one of the most radical allies of the homosexual lobby to sit on the Supreme Court.

Solicitor General Elena Kagan has a long record of being an extreme champion of the radical homosexual agenda.

As Dean of Harvard Law School, Elena Kagan banned military recruiters on campus because of her strident opposition to Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.

You see, Elena Kagan believes the radical homosexual agenda is more important than making sure we have the strongest and most cohesive military possible.

But that isn’t even the worst example of the lengths the my administration will go to placate their radical homosexual base with the nomination of Elena Kagan.

CBS News recently published a report that Elena Kagan was actually a homosexual.

Responding to pressure by the homosexual lobby, my administration furiously lobbied CBS to remove the blog post.

Yes I can nominate Solicitor General Elena Kagan to be the next Supreme Court Justice.

As Solicitor General, Kagan made arguments against the pro-family Defense of Marriage Act stating the act is not “rationally related to any legitimate government interests in procreation and child rearing.”

As Dean of Harvard Law School, the position she held before becoming Solicitor General, Elena Kagan banned military recruiters from her campus solely because of her strident opposition to theU.S.armed forces’ Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.

On top of that, leading homosexual activists have praised the nomination believing that a Justice Kagan would rule in favor of imposing the Homosexual Agenda onAmerica.

Yes I can beholden to Homosexual Lobby for their massive campaign contributions.

Yes I can chose my alliance with the Homosexual Lobby over containing an environmental disaster.

You see, Dr. Jonathan Katz was hired as part of think tank to resolve the oil spill crisis, but was fired for an article written against homosexuality over a decade ago.

Yes it’s my decision on who is hired for this job.  But think about it for a minute.

Dr. Katz is obviously competent, being a professor of astrophysics.

He was hired as a consultant to resolve a crisis, not hold public office.  And it’s a crisis with the potential to cost the surrounding gulf industries billions upon billions of dollars, not to mention the devastation it will cause to sea life.

So why was this highly qualified individual fired?

Because of a non-related article advocating his beliefs on the immorality and dangers of homosexuality.  YES I LOVE THE HOMOSexuals

Yes I can sign on October 28, 2009 Thought Control into law.

This law allows for prosecution of an individual for any speech, letters, emails, sermons, etc. deemed offensive by homosexuals.

Yes I can sign into law immoral legislation such as the Gay Bill of Special Rights, the Homosexual Classrooms Act, and the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

The Gay Bill of Special Rights is on the verge of passage as well as the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. And now they’re moving on our children with the Homosexual Classrooms Act. You and I know where that road leads:

  • School children being forced to sit through homosexual re-education classes disguised as course to encourage “tolerance” and “awareness.”
  • Churches and day-care centers forced by law to hire known homosexuals and even so-called “transsexuals.”
  • Homosexuals being allowed to marry and “adopt” children into their lifestyle.

That’s only the beginningAmericaas I love Gays & Homos

The Radical Homosexuals are determined to wear down any resistance to their perversion. And it’s working:

  • In 1998 we saw the first-ever election to Congress of an openly homosexual non-incumbent, Tammy Baldwin, followed by a slew of politicians “coming out” such as Barney Frank and Jared Polis.
  • Family events websites advertised the “gay march” onWashingtonas a great way to spend a Saturday with the family.
  • Throngs of homosexuals parade their new “marriages” in front of the media each time a new state destroys the sanctity of marriage.
  • Liberal, pro-homosexual Democrats now control Congress and the White House and so-called “conservative” Republicans are on the run.

Yes I can pass the Thought Control law. What does this mean to traditional families and people who disagree with homos? At theUniversityofIllinois, Professor Ken Howell was fired from his position as a teacher of Modern Catholic Thought for privately agreeing with his church’s teaching that homosexual sex is immoral.

The professor emailed a student to clarify the Catholic Church’s view that homosexuality is contrary to natural law. Unfortunately for the professor, he also mentioned his agreement with his church.

Another student then complained to the head of the religion department declaring that the professor’s expressing his opinion on homosexual activity was a “hate crime.”

As a result, the professor was relieved at the end of the semester. We can expect to hear more outrageous stories like that of Ken Howell. YES I CAN HATE THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH HOMOS BY HAVING THEM FIRED.  YES HOMOS RIGHTS MEAN MORE THAN NORMAL AMEIRCAN RIGHTS

Yes I can deny parents the right to educate their children into a belief in traditional marriage by passing the Homosexual Adoption Bill and indoctrination bills like the Homosexual Classrooms Act.

Yes I can help save my reelection prospects by paying off the Radical Homosexual Lobby by granting every wish on their perverse list.

Just this year I have..

…Pledged the end of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and the infiltration ofAmerica’s military by flamboyant homosexuals…

…Pledged to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and even called it “Discriminatory.”

…Nominated radical homosexual ally Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court.

And the Gay Bill of Special Rights?

I have promised these radical homosexuals that “We’re pushing hard to pass the [Gay Bill of Special Rights]… I will not waver in my commitment.”

I even begged these Homosexual Lobbyists to help him force this plan through before the midterm elections.

Yes I love the Homosexuals.

Special job rights for homosexuals and lesbians.  Businesses may have to adopt hiring quotas to protect themselves from lawsuits.  Every homosexual fired or not hired becomes a potential federal civil rights lawsuit.

Radical homosexuals will terrorize day care centers, hospitals, churches and private schools.  Traditional moral values will be shattered by federal law.

*** Same-sex marriages and adoptions.  Wedding-gown clad men smooching before some left-wing clergy or state official is just the beginning.

You’ll see men hand-in-hand skipping down to adoption centers to “pick out” a little boy for themselves.

*** Homosexual advocacy in schools.  Your children or grandchildren will be taught homosexuality is moral, natural and good.  High school children will learn perverted sex acts as part of “safe sex” education.

With condoms already handed out in many schools, Radical Homosexuals will have little trouble adopting today’s “if it feels good do it” sex-ed curriculum to their agenda.

And to add insult to injury, lobbyists for the Homosexual Agenda are paid off with your tax dollars!

That’s right, radical homosexual groups like the Gay-Lesbian Task Force and ACT-UP receive millions from the government.

Hundreds of millions of dollars flow from taxpayers to homosexual activists through funding for homosexual “art,” so-called AIDS-awareness programs, and research grants.

===========================================================

GOVENRMENT CONTROL & DICTATORSHIP _AKA Socialism – MY WAR on Freedom

National Opinion Survey

Yes I can pack town hall meetings with labor union thugs who severely beat citizens who expressed concerns about my government-run health care plan.

Yes I can destroy the US Constitution.

 

Is Bombing of LibyaWithout Congressional         Approval an Impeachable         Offense?                  ,American airmen and women are risking their lives in the airspace over Libya – and Obama hasn’t  asked for a Constitutionally mandated authorization from the U.S.         Congress.

Once again, Barack Obama is blithely ignoring         the U.S.         Constitution.

Help us rein in this out-of-control rogue politician by answering our special Libyan Impeachment Inquiry Survey  by going         here .

Your Libyan Impeachment Inquiry Survey,         combined with those of thousands of other outraged Americans, will         drive home the point that

However, Obama asserted that the “use of         force” was “authorized” by the “strong         resolution” of the “U.N. Security Council,” which was         acting “in response to a call for action by the Libyan people and         the Arab League.”

The U.N. ?

The Arab League?

Obama asked the United Nations and the         Arab League for permission to blast the Libyans without asking the U.S.         Congress!  Now, he playing         around with words to avoid having to follow the clear directions of the         Constitution.  His mouthpieces         have dubbed the use of 2,000 Marines and hundreds of U.S.         ships and planes as a “kinetic military action” rather than a         war.

It would be funny if brave American fighting men         and women’s lives weren’t on the line.

What other adventures will Obama drag America         into with his seemingly limitless schemes to declare and wage war?

Obama is openly trashing the Constitution         for his own purposes.

It’s up to the American people to tell Obama that         he’s not above the Constitution.

This outrageous overstepping of his authority         should be the last straw.

 

 

 

 Yes I can control and take over the internet. The Federal Communications Commission is considering sweeping new regulations on something called, “Network Neutrality.” As with the “Fairness Doctrine,” “Network Neutrality” is a code word that means something far more sinister – “Government Control.”

The irony, of course, is that their proposal wouldn’t make the internet more “neutral.” Far from it. It would regulate it like a big-government utility, taking away the very competitive forces that have made internet technologies the cutting-edge of innovation. Part and parcel of their proposal is a foray into content regulation which could effectively squash dissenting viewpoints.

When government regulates a business, that business must be cautious about criticizing the government. Just look at how the Obama Administration is choosing the CEO, and even the union ownership, of General Motors. When the government begins to take over an industry, that industry becomes in large part a servant to that government. Is this what we want with the Internet?

HeyAmericathink I will not do it? Think strong-armed government tactics would not be employed? Keep in mind what the White House did over the summer, during the heart of the outpouring of citizen protest over health care reform proposals. They asked for their friends to report on any “fishy stories” or “misinformation” that they saw. Obama loyalists were asked to report stories critical of Obamacare to the White House directly, including any e-mail addresses and website links associated with the offending stories.

Yes I can make Americainto another Canada. Obamacare (Obamamania) And The Ghost Of Pierre Trudeau

Yes I can pass a financial”reform” plan that actually benefits the big banks and Wall Street firms, especially Goldman Sachs, at the expense of smaller companies and the rest of us,

Chris Dodd’s legislation, which should be called the “Fed Empowerment Act,” ignores the true cause of the recent financial downturn: interference in our economy and manipulation of our currency by Congress, the Treasury, and the Federal Reserve.

For all the talk of “change” in D.C., our elected officials are following the same tired old script: if the federal government created the problem, the only solution must be to give it even more power.

Now Senate leaders want to create a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will be housed in and funded by the Fed.

And the Dodd bill would create a “Financial Stability Oversight Council” that would have the ability to require nonbank financial companies to be under the Federal Reserve’s supervision based not on their current status, but on what effect they may potentially have on the economy!

Who knows how many businesses will soon be targeted and broken up, under the guise of “reform,” solely for standing up to the federal government.

Recently, Washington Examiner journalist Tim Carney has done some terrific work exposing the corporatism behind the White House’s rhetoric.

To see how Obama’s “reform” plan will actually benefit the big banks and Wall Street firms, especially Goldman Sachs, at the expense of smaller companies and the rest of us, click here to read his piece entitled “Goldman rallies for Obama in Wall Street ‘reform’

Yes I can redistribute the wealth by ordering BP to pay $20 billion into a slush fund that I can used to help union bosses, ACORN and add to my and other Democrats reelection coffers. This under the rouse that I want to help Americans suffering from the disaster in the gulf.

Yes I can regulate and take over the internet. Watch me. Afterall Al invented it and I will regulate it and control it.

Yes I can use a massive egg recall to shove S. 510, the so-called “Food Safety Modernization Act,” down Americans throats.

S. 510, through a patchwork of rules and regulations on the food “industry,” will throwAmerica’s heartland under the government-subsidized corporatist bus as it crushes local and community producers of healthy food.

S. 510 will further drive up the costs of living by adding more layers of bureaucracy on food production – ensuring you pay more to meet an essential need.

Congress certainly won’t be the one tightening its belt.  Section 401 of S. 510 authorizes nearly $1 billion to grow the FDA’s reach and calls for almost 4,000 new bureaucrats to be hired in fiscal year 2010 alone.

This onerous new law will apply harshly to reputable food producers like the independent family farm, where the free market works every day to provide the public with healthy choices.

Meanwhile, Big Agriculture will continue to use its well-entrenched connections to make sure it escapes serious scrutiny.

The statists have worked to replace “credible evidence” with “reasonable probability” in the U.S. Code, giving the FDA power to invade, quarantine, or shut down private property in search of any foodborne illness.

They also changed “presents a threat of serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals” to “is adulterated or misbranded.”  What exactly constitutes adulterated?  That glass of raw milk?  An FDA bureaucrat will decide.

It gets worse.

The bill also grants blanket authority for federal agencies to impose international guidelines and standards on domestic food producers – giving agencies authority to harmonize all American food production and processes in line with the globalist Codex.

Yes I can control the Internet. Despite the very clear message sent by the American people on Election Day, President Obama’s three unelected Democrat commissioners at the FCC are reportedly moving full steam ahead with plans to bypass Congress and slap burdensome and unnecessary regulation on, of all things… the Internet.

And they are planning to do so within a matter of weeks, against the will of the American people and before the newly-elected Congress you’ve chosen convenes in January.

Make no mistake… such regulation, misnamed “Net Neutrality,” is anything but neutral.  It puts the Government in charge of managing the Internet’s infrastructure.  In fact, if “Net Neutrality” supporters get their way, all Internet infrastructure and online content would constitute public property – fully owned and controlled by the Federal Government.

Yes I can lie and blame tax paying Americans for trying to shut down the government.

Not a Congress, White House, Treasury, and Federal Reserve that have racked up more than $14 trillion in debt.  Not legislators whose policies will result in a $1.6 trillion budget deficit in this year alone. Not the statists who want to force you to bow to their demands and fund their agenda with your tax dollars.

They’re blaming you, me, and everyone else who thinksAmericahas no choice but to slam on the brakes before we fly over the edge. Unlike the federal government, let’s be honest.  The kind of debate we have witnessed over the past several months has almost nothing to do with what over half a million Campaign forLibertymembers have joined our organization to accomplish. While we want government on all levels reduced and its spending drastically curbed, the White House and congressional leadership have agreed to less than $40 billion in cuts this year.  That’s not even a pinprick on the colossal monster their reckless mismanagement has unleashed.

Despite the establishment’s fear mongering, if the government had “shut down,” the Treasury Department would have continued to sell debt, the printing presses would have rolled on, the IRS would still have confiscated your hard-earned money on time (though getting any back may have been delayed), the surveillance state would have kept watching you, and the TSA would have remained in airports nationwide to sexually assault fliers.

If our “leaders” were serious, they would:

–   Thoroughly audit the Federal Reserve and end Ben Bernanke’s ability to control our economic future with no real accountability or oversight.  Then they would abolish the Fed entirely.

–   Debate and vote on Rand Paul’s proposal to cut $500 billion from the budget.  This year.  And that would only be for starters.

–   Enact a Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment with legitimate spending restrictions.

–   Free us to make our own health care decisions by halting the implementation of a program to force Americans to buy bureaucrat-approved insurance and give the government more control over what remains of the free market.

–   Strengthen our national security by refusing to use our military to police the world, nation-build, and enforce the United Nations’ dictates.

–   Protect civil liberties by repealing the Patriot Act, eliminating the TSA, and ending the many other ways government intrudes into our lives.

The list of what is not being addressed could go on and on, which further proves how the vast majority of both Republicans and Democrats are ignoring their oaths to defend the Constitution.

Government doesn’t need a tune-up.  It’s time for a complete overhaul, which is why a real shutdown is needed.

Instead,Americais in for more posturing for the cameras, blame-shifting, and name calling – traits more expected of spoiled brats than elected officials.

America’s debt crisis is a natural consequence of a system so wrecked by statism that less than $40 billion in cuts to a multi-trillion dollar budget nearly brings the government to its knees. Out of control legislators and their dangerous policies brought us to this point.

I understand Michelle my belle Obama.  Yes I can give America a surprise Christmas present. Barack Obama has a “Christmas surprise” for the American people. It’s based upon the FCC’s self-imposed December 21 deadline to implement new Internet rules.

Mr. Obama wants to take control of the Internet through FCC regulation. We’re talking about YOUR Internet. YOUR ability to contact your friends. YOUR relatives. And YOUR elected representatives in government.

This “stealth” use of new FCC rules and regulations will sneak up on us just before Christmas. TOMORROW! Quite frankly, not too many people know about this; or took the notion serious because, after all, we have the 1st Amendment to the U. S. Constitution to protect us. Right? Wrong!

The FCC is ready to add the Internet to its “portfolio” of regulated industries. The Obama Administration wants to take control of the Internet tomorrow! (even though the regulations won’t “officially” go into effect until after the holidays). FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski announced that he has circulated “draft rules” that he says will “preserve the freedom and openness of the Internet.” No statement—I call it a bald face lie—reflects the vast gulf between the rhetoric and the reality of Obama Administration policy.

Obama’s FCC is ready to steal our Internet freedom by simply declaring it has the “right” to regulate it. Here’s the underlying problem for Barack Obama. Internet journalists tend to report the news without coloring it with the brush of “political correctness.” They challenge the lies that the Obama Administration puts out that the so-called “mainstream media” simply accept and repeat as the truth.

We must be prepared to do battle with the intrusive FCC federal regulations that will clamp down on our 1st Amendment rights via the Internet.

Yes I can control the internet because I am the nazi and tyrant in charge and I do not likeAmericanor the Constitution. I will do whatever I want including not protecting the borders which I swore by oath to do but I was just lyingAmerica.

President Obama has the POWER TO PULL THE PLUG on the Internet here in theUnited States, just like Hosni Mubarak’s administration did inEgypt during the uprising. The FCC’s Net Neutrality Act, passed by a vote of 3-2 along party lines on December 21, 2010, gives “kill-switch” authorization to the federal government.

The full implementation of this Act will take place 60 days after the date of the Act, which is FEBRUARY 21, 2011.

THAT MEANS ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 21ST, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WILL TAKE CONTROL OF THE INTERNET UNLESS WE ACT TO STOP THEM.

Yes I can attack Governor Walker when he goes against my union thug buddies. Obama should stop worrying aboutWisconsinand get to work onWashington’s out-of-control federal budget

Here’s what Governor Walker’s Budget Repair Bill that tI am so opposed to and angry about actually does:

– Ask government workers to pay half the cost of their pensions – still less than private employees pay for their pensions

– Ask government workers to pay 12% of their own health insurance premiums – the national average for the private sector is over 20%

– End collective bargaining for government unions for pensions and benefits.  Allow bargaining only for raises that are less than inflation.

– End forced union dues, collected by the state.  Union dues would become voluntary.

– Union members get to vote yearly on whether to keep their union.

Yes I can lie about cutting the budget. I promised to cut $100 billion each year from the budget, but I did keep that promise. That HOPE and Change stuff was a great chant to get me elected wasn’t itAmerica?.

===============================================================

MY WAR on ISRAEL

Yes I can stop supportingIsrael, helpIsrael’s enemies such asIranand blameIsraelfor all the world problems like Hitler did before me. Despite unanimous passage of the Iran Petroleum Sanctions Act in January, the Obama administration continues to resist efforts by Congress to impose mandatory sanctions on companies selling refined petroleum products toIran.

Yes I can stop supporting Israel and have Hilary Clinton make comments and implicit threats in a telephone conversation she had with Prime Minister Netanyahu, described in the March 12 Times. “In a tense, 43-minute phone call on Friday morning, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Israel’s plan for new housing units for Jews in East Jerusalemsent a ‘deeply negative signal’ about Israeli-American relations.”

Under President Clinton and George W. Bush, Israeli prime ministers have offered the Palestinians a state of their own on virtually the entire West Bank and Gaza, with land swaps to compensate for any portion of the West Bank that would remain in Israel, but those offers were rejected by the Palestinians.

Yes I can tell Joe and Hilary to threaten and bad mouth Israel including disturbing and truly harsh and inflammatory rhetoric of both Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton directed at the government of Israel. It is speculated that President Obama himself may have ordered Biden and Clinton to make the statements they made.

The Times reported, “The President was outraged by the announcement of 1,600 housing units in an ultra-Orthodox neighborhood in East Jerusalem during Mr. Biden’s visit, administration officials said.

“Mr. Obama was deeply involved in the strategy and planning for Mr. Biden’s visit and orchestrated the response from Mr. Biden and Mrs. Clinton after it went awry, these officials said.”

Yes I can make overly harsh reactions toIsrael for building homes for their citizens and emboldenIsrael’s enemies. President Obama and his administration’s overly harsh public reaction to the construction in East Jerusalem appears to have emboldenedIsrael’s enemies and provided a cover for their extremist views. It has also created a serious crisis of confidence among the Israeli public that it can depend on this administration for its security.

Yes I can condemn Israelfro building homes but say nothing about Russiahelping Iranobtain nuclear capability. When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government announced a West Bankhousing project during Vice President Joseph Biden’s recent visit — perhaps accidentally, perhaps not — my Administration immediately condemned it, privately and publicly. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton  boasted publicly that openly slamming a close American ally had produced positive results, helping to restart Middle East negotiations after 14 months of administration failure in Middle East.

Days later, on the very visit to Moscow where Secretary Clinton crowed about the beneficial effects of kicking friends in their public parts, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin revealed his reaction. Putin himself (no accident there) announced, right in the middle of a faltering U.S.-led effort to sanction Iran for its nuclear-weapons program, that Moscow would assist Iran in fueling the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear reactor.  Not only did Clinton not assault Putin publicly, she accepted firing up Bushehr as within Iran’s “rights,” notwithstanding that, in due course, reprocessed plutonium from Bushehr’s spent fuel will provide Iran with fissile material for nuclear weapons.

Our global position will rapidly deteriorate as friends distance themselves for their own self-protection and adversaries grow more adventuresome. What should Americans make of this behavior:  When blindsided by an ally, my Administration reacts with fury, but when slapped by a “peer competitor” (to put it diplomatically), my team smiles benignly.

THE Bible is clear; I will bless them that bless thee and curse them that curse thee. The worse flooding in 100 years occurred all thru the East Coast includingNew Yorkhome of Hilary just days after these incidents between BO andIsrael. BO snubbed the Prime Minister of Israel during his visit to the states. Walking out of a mtg., not having photos, and not having dinner.

Look for more natural disasters in theUSbecause of BO’s position of hatred againstIsrael. It is now spring time so look for more flooding and tornadoes. Also look for a worsening economic crises inAmericaand a total disaster in November for the libs and Democrats.

=======================================================================
MORE TAXES AMERICA – I Love raising your taxes. I am the TAX MAN.  Do with less Americans as I take more and more vacations and play more golf than any President ever and have fantastic dinners with dictators from China and other enemies of America.

MY WAR ON AMERICA
Yes I can impose more taxes on Americans.

* The new Obama/Pelosi/Reid health care takeover includes almost $564 billion in new taxes on American families and businesses.

* If the Bush tax cuts are allowed to expire on December 31 of this year (and President Obama and Speaker Pelosi say that is their intention), then we will see an almost $1-trillion tax increase.

* The Death Tax will come roaring back. The best news about today’s tax day is that for the first time in 94 years, death is not a taxable event inAmerica.  Unfortunately, Democrats want to bring back the death tax at an outrageous 55% rate!

* The top personal income tax rate will go back up to 39.6%.  Taxes will skyrocket on capital gains.

* 47% of Americans no longer pay personal income taxes due to policies coming out ofWashington,D.C., and it’s not surprising that the burden on the remaining most productive Americans keeps going up.

* You would think all this taxing means a balanced budget.  Of course, you would be wrong.  The federal budget deficit this year is expected to end up over $1.5 trillion.

Not surprisingly, all my taxing and spending is killing prosperity for Americans. In fact, personal income is down 3.2% since I took office when you exclude government handouts.

Yes I can impose more taxes on Americans. The powers that be are slapping a new tax on well-off Americans. After all, as I keep reiterating, it’s only right that the wealthiest among us pay “their fair share.”

So that’s how a brand-new tax on what the redistributionists like to call “unearned income” became the law of the land. Starting next year, if you earn more than $200,000 a year, expect to see another bite taken out of anything you’ve managed to save. The new tax will cover interest on your Certificates of Deposit and other savings accounts; any dividends you make on stocks or mutual funds, rental income on any real estate you own, and anything else our masters in Washington can classify as “unearned” income.

Hey Independents, thanks for voting me in, I’ll take your money now!

Yes I can lie and state that the well-off Americans aren’t paying “their fair share” .This lie is great because it fosters the culture of envy that dominates almost all of our politics.

Let’s look at the numbers to see what the truth really is. The last year for which the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has released figures is 2007. Look at what the government’s own figures show:

  • The top 1 percent of      taxpayers in this country pay 40.42 percent of all income taxes.
  • For the top 5 percent, the      percentage is even higher. The 7.1 million taxpayers who fit this      description pay 60.63 percent of all Federal income taxes.
  • The bigger the net, the      greater the discrepancy. The top 25 percent of taxpayers (35.3 million of      us) can take pride in knowing that we contribute 86.59 percent of federal      taxes. And the top 50 percent (70.5 million of us) pay 97.11 of the total      taxes collected.

In comparison, the bottom 50 percent of filers—some 70.5 million of Americans with any kind of income—pay a minuscule 2.89 percent of federal tax dollars.

By what possible rationale can anyone say that the “rich” in this country don’t pay their fare share? If the 71.22 percent that the top 10 percent in this country pay isn’t “their fair share,” then what is? I’d really like to know how Obamaites justify urging government to confiscate more of our earnings.

MY RAINWATER TAX –Yes I can force Americans to pay a tax on “rainwater runoff” from homes and small businesses. The EPA, under radical environmentalist Lisa Jackson, is proposing regulations to do just that.

Take a look at the EPA’s own Federal Register filing, where the EPA generally describes the initiative it’s proposing:

…requirements, including design or performance standards, for stormwater discharges from, at minimum, newly developed and redeveloped sites. EPA intends to propose regulatory options that would revise the NPDES regulations and establish a comprehensive program to address stormwater discharges from newly developed and redeveloped sites and to take final action no later than November 2012. (Source)

This is bureaucratic-speak for having the EPA force cities and counties to limit stormwater runoff to levels the EPA deems acceptable.  Limiting “rainwater runoff” will mean forcing homeowners and businesses to pay new taxes in order to rein in rainwater, and that’s no pun intended.

Think about just how big-government this is.  A Washington, D.C.bureaucracy plans on forcing your local county or city to slap new taxes on you and me because this big-government bureaucracy wants to micro-manage rainwater across the entire country.  Already, several counties and cities across the United Statesare moving to pass new taxes and fees in anticipation of the new EPA rules, including cities in states as disparate as Florida, Ohioand Kansas.  For more details CLICK HERE

But really, this new EPA outrage is part of the pattern of the my Administration.  Cap-and-trade is bogged down for now in the Senate (though they’ll try to bring it back this year), so the liberals try to use an un-elected bureaucracy to pass their radical agenda.  First, they declared that greenhouse gases are a “threat” to the environment and to health, so they’re pushing new regulations that will in effect pass cap-and-trade without Congress having to act.  Now, they’re pushing this new “rainwater runoff” tax.

Man I love this stuff, next tax the air you breathe and the sun. Gun tax is coming soon along with Net Worth Tax!

Yes I can impose a “salt tax”. Be very scaredAmericabecause I will control your salt intact to help keep health care cost down. The more salt you eat the more taxes you pay.

Yes I can loan trillions of dollars to Wall Street firms, loan trillions to foreign central banks and even billions to companies including Harley-Davidson & GE.

This release is just a small glimpse into what the Fed does everyday – devalue our money, create moral hazard, and put taxpayers on the hook.  And we can only speculate on how much the Fed isn’t telling us, including information on individual securities that were pledged as collateral for over $800 billion in loans. I call this prepay back for getting me relected in 2012.

I love to spend US tax payer dollars and take more vacations than any other President ever. I really do hateAmericaand Americans.

======================================================

MY WAR ON FREE SPEECH & 1st AMENDMENT

Yes I can demonize those who disagree with me stating: “Well, I think that when you listen to Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck, it’s pretty apparent, and it’s troublesome,”. “But keep in mind that there have been periods in American history where this kind of vitriol comes out”. Obama: Limbaugh, Beck Spreading ‘Vitriol’

Yes I can use the power of the Federal Communications Commission to regulate conservative talk radio out of existence — with their so called “Fairness Doctrine” — which would require radio stations that carry shows like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin to provide “equal time” to liberals . . . for FREE.

Radio stations that don’t comply will have their broadcast licenses revoked. So radio stations will have little choice but to cancel conservative radio programs.

I do not have any respect for free speech. His White House has asked Americans to report to the White House any email or conversation they might have had with their friends and neighbors that was negative (“fishy” was the White House term) about my Socialist Health Care Plan.

Yes I can tell Americans to shut up and thank me for being president. I had this to say about those who crticized my Socialist Health Care Plan at town hall meetings hosted by Congress:

“I don’t want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking. I want them just to get out of the way so we can clean up the mess.”

Yes I can call Americans names who disagree with me trying to intimidate them to shut up. For more than a year Democrats and their mainstream media lapdogs have sought to portray Tea partiers as everything from ignoramuses to racist skinheads to gun-wielding, Bible-toting terrorists.    http://www.personalliberty.com/freedom-concerns/president-clinton-and-tea-partyterrorists/

Yes I can make fun of Americans. At a fundraiser inConnecticut, I made remarks dripping with contempt when I talked about you and the other 1.5 million citizen-activist members of AFP:

“…right now, all across the country, special interests are planning and running millions of dollars of attack ads against Democratic candidates….Millions of dollars.  And, the groups are benign-sounding:  Americans for Prosperity.  Who’s against that? [Laughter] Or Committee for Truth in Politics.  Or Americans for Apple Pie.  Moms for Motherhood.  I made those last two up.  [Laughter]”

“…You don’t know if it’s a Wall Street bank. You don’t know if it’s a big oil company.  You don’t know if it’s an insurance company.  You don’t even know if it’s a foreign-controlled entity.”

I made similar remarks inTexaslast month and raised $985,000.

Tickets to thisConnecticutfundraiser cost $1,000 per person.  $12,400 if you wanted a picture with the President.  With an estimated 300 people in attendance, they raised quite a pretty penny here by attacking YOU and AFP.

Yes I can call Americans who disagree with me and my policies “enemies” to describe political opponents just before an election.

Our brave troops are fighting real “enemies” in Afghanastan andIraq.  Terriorist “enemies” are constantly attempting to kill Americans on our home soil.

Yet, I BO President chooses to use the word “enemies” to describe fellow Americans opposing my agenda.

Yes I can give Americaa surprise Christmas present. Barack Obama has a “Christmas surprise” for the American people. It’s based upon the FCC’s self-imposed December 21 deadline to implement new Internet rules.

Mr. Obama wants to take control of the Internet through FCC regulation. We’re talking about YOUR Internet. YOUR ability to contact your friends. YOUR relatives. And YOUR elected representatives in government.

This “stealth” use of new FCC rules and regulations will sneak up on us just before Christmas. TOMORROW! Quite frankly, not too many people know about this; or took the notion serious because, after all, we have the 1st Amendment to the U. S. Constitution to protect us. Right? Wrong!

The FCC is ready to add the Internet to its “portfolio” of regulated industries. The Obama Administration wants to take control of the Internet tomorrow! (even though the regulations won’t “officially” go into effect until after the holidays). FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski announced that he has circulated “draft rules” that he says will “preserve the freedom and openness of the Internet.” No statement—I call it a bald face lie—reflects the vast gulf between the rhetoric and the reality of Obama Administration policy.

Obama’s FCC is ready to steal our Internet freedom by simply declaring it has the “right” to regulate it. Here’s the underlying problem for Barack Obama. Internet journalists tend to report the news without coloring it with the brush of “political correctness.” They challenge the lies that the Obama Administration puts out that the so-called “mainstream media” simply accept and repeat as the truth.

=============================================================

My War on National Security

Yes I can announceAmerica’s brand new approach to using nuclear weapons: we won’t use them! Actually, he does leave a few scenarios when we can use nukes, but mostly just ties our hands. Especially disturbing is the part about not being able to retaliate with a nuke if a country in compliance with the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty hits us with a bio or chemical attack. Thanks, BO!

Yes I can try to appease our enemies, smile, shake their hands, have photo-ops and sign bogus agreements with them. According to The Times of April 3, “Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin of Russiavisited Venezuelaon Friday to sign a series of military and oil agreements with President Hugo Chavez, who is seeking to expand ties with Russia as a way of countering the influence of the United States in Latin America.”

The Times also reported that “Mr. Chavez had suggested before Mr. Putin’s arrival that the countries could cooperate ambitiously on nuclear energy ( sound familiar, think Iran ) and a satellite-launching base in Venezuela.”

What would we do if Venezuela invited Russia to build a missile launch pad, or Russia provided Venezuela with the plans and materials for building nuclear weapons? Would there be a replay of the Cuban missile crisis of the 1960s?

Based on our continuing failure to confront North Korea and Iran with regard to their nuclear activities, we would do nothing. My administration has decided to live with the idea that these two rogue states — North Korea and Iran — can do as they please on the nuclear front.

There is a foul whiff of Munich and appeasement in the air.

A harbinger of what is to come is my administration’s abysmal treatment of our close ally, Israel. My willingness to throw Israel under the bus is an attempt to court better relations with the Sunni Arab countries. I believes that better relations with the Sunni Arabs will mean less hostility to the U.S. and greater access to oil.

However, hatred of the U.S. has little to do with what we do and a lot to do with what we are — a free, secular, and democratic country that protects the rights of women and minorities.

Obama’s Global Failure Makes U.S. Much Less Secure

Yes I can ban using words such as terrorists and Islamic Extremist to get our enemies to love us, and yes I can and will still call Americans who disagree with me extremist. Yes I love that kooky kool-aid. Since I went toCairo,Egypt, and promised a “new beginning” in the relationship between theUnited Statesand the Muslim world I consider myself a true hero. I am a Muslim and I love Muslims and their book the Koran that calls for Muslims to take over the world and kill the infidel/unbelievers.

Peter Feaver, aDukeUniversitypolitical scientist and former Bush adviser, is skeptical of Obama’s engagement effort. It “doesn’t appear to have created much in the way of strategic benefit” in the Middle East peace process or in negotiations overIran’s nuclear ambitions, he said. He runs the political risk of seeming to adopt politically correct rhetoric abroad while appearing tone deaf on national security issues at home, Feaver said.

Yes I can fly around the world bowing down to world leaders, laughing it up with dictators, and singing peace treaties with our enemies that they do not plan to uphold.  In June, I will travel toIndonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim country, and I will revisit many of the themes of hisCairospeech. I probably will callAmericaarrogant and blameAmericafor all the worlds problems along withIsrael.

============================================================

My WAR on US Military

Yes I can say the”don’t ask, don’t tell.” rule is not fair for gays and Defense Secretary Robert Gates has launched a lengthy study to determine how to allow gays to serve openly without hurting military effectiveness. Marine General: Gays Would Get Their Own Rooms

Yes I can vacation in Chicagoand skip the traditional Memorial Day ceremonies at ArlingtonNationalCemetery.

 MY WAR On CAPITALISM

Yes I can reward Big Labor at the expense of working families and small businesses.

 Should I destroy the Secret Ballot?

Yes I can pursue the silent but economically devastating agenda of forced unionization The agenda is attended to daily in the White House. Please note the following headlines:

Troubled Labor Looks To Federal Government For Help On Pensions

Rosa DeLauro Says ‘High Road’ Government Contracting Policy Is Coming

Big Labor Forces Its Way Into The Ranks Of Big Government

Yes I can cut secret deals with Big Labor on health care and other critical matters and work fanatically to impose forced unionism onAmericaand appoint Big Labor operatives such as:

>>> Hilda Solis, now Secretary of Labor, was an officer at “American Rights at Work,” a Big Labor front group funded by the AFL-CIO and the radical Service Employees International Union (SEIU).

>>> Deborah Greenfield, now a high-ranking Labor Department official, worked as a top attorney at the AFL-CIO before she parachuted into DOL during the Obama transition period.

Before President Obama made her a top official at DOL,Greenfieldwas an attorney for the AFL-CIO.

In that role,Greenfieldlaunched a lawsuit against the Bush Administration’s attempt to require a modest increase in the information on financial disclosure forms filed by unions and union officials.

The Big Labor bosses, of course, want to keep their spending on expensive trips, big restaurant tabs, personal luxuries, and the like (not to mention forced-dues political spending) hidden from rank-and-file workers.

Not surprisingly, one of the first actions taken by Obama’s Labor Department, under the control of Hilda Solis and Deborah Greenfield, was to STOP these reforms — the very reformsGreenfieldhad been trying to kill as an AFL-CIO litigator.

This immediately set off alarm bells about a potential conflict of interest betweenGreenfield’s role as an AFL-CIO lawyer and her role as a Labor Department official killing the very regulations she had been trying to put in the deep freeze.

My WAR on the MIDDLE CLASS _Spreading the Wealth on Steroids

Yes I can give the money to whomever I want. I call it spreading the wealth. Some have said that the stimulus hasn’t saved any jobs

Date: Monday, August 16, 2010, 10:17 PM

Some have said that the stimulus hasn’t saved any     jobsbut     here is a case where at least one job was saved.Take     for instance Oregon State University Athletic Director Bob     DeCarolis.

Now     Mr. DeCarolis was considering firing their Basketball Coach…….Craig     Robinson

after     an 8 -11 start (2-5) in the Pac 10 conference). He looks pretty jolly for     such a lousy record!

When     word reached Washington, Undersecretary     of Education Martha Kanter

was     dispatched toCorvallis    with $17 million in stimulus money for the university.

Thankfully,Craig     Robinson’s job is safe for another year

Now     comes the interesting part of our story…. For those of you unfamiliar     with Coach Robinson,

he     just so happens to be the brother-in-law of none other than our country’s     beloved President,

NOW     YOUR CATCHING ON…… that’s right he is the brother of Michelle     Obama!

But     hey, can’t we all come to the conclusion that Coach Robinson’s job security     was all just a coincidence?

I’m     sure of it …. Aren’t You?

Thank     Goodness For The Stimulus!!! But $17 million for one job?  I wonder     what mine is worth?   If this doesn’t     anger you, nothing will…  remember to vote this fall!

 

 

Yes I can require you to have a license on your home. I love putting it to the rich and the middle class.

We encourage you to read the provisions of the Cap and Trade Bill that has passed the House of Representatives and being considered by the Senate. We are ready to join the next march onWashington! This Congress and whoever on their staffs that write this junk are truly out to destroy the middle class of the U.S.A ….

A License will be required for your house…no longer just for cars and mobile homes….Thinking about selling your house.  Take a look at H.R.

2454  (Cap and Trade bill).  This is unbelievable!  Only the beginning from this administration! Home owners take note & tell your friends and relatives who are home owners!

Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Cap and Trade Act, you won’t be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act. H.R. 2454, the “Cap & Trade”

bill passed by the House of Representatives, if it is also passed by the Senate, will be the largest tax increase any of us has ever experienced.

The Congressional Budget Office (supposedly non-partisan) estimates that in just a few years the average cost to every family of four will be $6,800 per year. No one is excluded.  However, once the lower classes feel the pinch in their wallets, you can be sure these voters get a tax refund (even if they pay no taxes at all) to offset this new cost. Thus, you Mr. And Mrs. Middle Class have to pay even more since additional tax dollars will be needed to bail out everyone else..

But wait. This awful bill (that no one in Congress has actually read) has many more surprises in it. Probably the worst one is this: A year from now you won’t be able to sell your house. Yes, you read that right.

The caveat is (there always is a caveat) that if you have enough money to make required major upgrades to your home, then you can sell it. But, if not, then forget it. Even pre-fabricated homes (“mobile homes”) are included. In effect, this bill prevents you from selling your home without the permission of the EPA administrator.

To get this permission,you will have to have the energy efficiency of your home measured. Then the government will tell you what your new energy efficiency requirement is and you will be forced to make modifications to your home under the retrofit provisions of this Act to comply with the new energy and water efficiency requirements.

Then you will have to get your home measured again and get a license (called a “label” in the Act) that must be posted on your property to show what your efficiency rating is; sort of like the Energy Star efficiency rating label on your refrigerator or air conditioner. If you don’t get a high enough rating, you can’t sell.

And, the EPA administrator is authorized to raise the standards every year, even above the automatic energy efficiency increases built into the Act. The EPA administrator, appointed by the President, will run the Cap & Trade program  (AKA the “American Clean Energy and Security Act of

2009”) and is authorized to make any future changes to the regulations and standards he/she alone determines to be in the government’s best interest. Requirements are set low initially so the bill will pass Congress; then the Administrator can set much tougher new standards every year.

The Act itself contains annual required increases in energy efficiency for private and commercial residences and buildings. However, the EPA administrator can set higher standards at any time. Sect. 202 Building Retrofit Program mandates a national retrofit program to increase the energy efficiency of all existing homes acrossAmerica.

Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Act, you won’t be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act. You had better sell soon, because the standards will be raised each year and will be really hard (I.e.,

ex$pen$ive) to meet in a few years. Oh, goody!

The Act allows the government to give you a grant of several thousand dollars to comply with the retrofit program requirements IF you meet certain energy efficiency levels. But, wait, the State can set additional requirements on who qualifies to receive the grants. You should expect requirements such as “can’t have an income of more than $50K per year”, “home selling price can’t be more than 125K”, or anything else to target the upper middle class (and that’s YOU) and prevent them from qualifying for the grants.

Most of us won’t get a dime and will have to pay the entire cost of the retrofit out of our own pockets. More transfer of wealth, more “change you can believe in.” Sect. 204 Building Energy Performance Labeling Program establishes a labeling program that for each individual residence will identify the achieved energy efficiency performance for “at least 90 percent of the residential market within 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.”

This means that within 5 years 90% of all residential homes in theU.S.

must be measured and labeled. The EPA administrator will get $50M each year to enforce the labeling program. The Secretary of the Department of Energy will get an additional $20M each year to help enforce the labeling program. Some of this money will, of course, be spent on coming up with tougher standards each year…

Oh, the label will be like a license for your car. You will be required to post the label in a conspicuous location in your home and will not be allowed to sell your home without having this label. And, just like your car license, you will probably be required to get a new label every so often – maybe every year.

But, the government estimates the cost of measuring the energy efficiency of your home should only cost about $200 each time. Remember what they said about the auto smog inspections when they first started:

that inCaliforniait would only cost $15.

That was when the program started. Now the cost is about $50 for the inspection and certificate; a 333% increase. Expect the same from the home labeling program. Sect. 304 Greater Energy Efficiency in Building Codes establishes new energy efficiency guidelines for the National Building Code and mandates at 304(d) that 1 year after enactment of this Act, all state and local jurisdictions must adopt the National Building Code energy efficiency provisions or must obtain a certification from the federal government that their state and/or local codes have been brought into full compliance with the National Building Code energy efficiency standards.

CHECK OUT Just a few of the sites;

Cap and Trade: A License Required for your Home

http://www.nachi.org/forum/f14/cap-and-trade-license-required-your-home

44750/

<http://www.nachi.org/forum/f14/cap-and-trade-license-required-your-home

-44750/>

HR2454 American Clean Energy & Security Act:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2454

Cap & Trade A license required for your home:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/cap-and-trade-a-license-required-for-your-ho

me.html

Cap and trade is a license to cheat and steal:

http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/columns/oped_contributors/Cap-and-trad

e-is-a-license-to-cheat-and-steal-45371937.html

Cap and Trade: A License Required for your Home:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2393940/posts

Thinking about selling you House? Look at HR 2454:

http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/10/01/thinking-about-selling-your-ho

use-a-look-at-h-r-2454-cap-and-trade-bill/

Yes I can mismanage the economy on everything from industry to energy and it is certain to push interest rates higher—much, much higher. TAKE THAT AMERICA I WON! It is on purpose.

MY PAY BACK TO THE UNIONS

Yes I can pass the Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill (S. 3194) .

You see, Senator Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi are already resorting to the same underhanded tactics they used to pass Socialized Obama Healthcare Nationalization Scheme into law.

The Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill is designed to force every firefighter and police officer in the country under union boss control.

Worse, it’s just the first step toward forcing ALL state and local public employees under Big Labor’s thumb.

And during these troubled economic times, passage of the Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill is the LAST thing we need.

Just take a look at California for the results of this madness.

Last year, the City ofVallejowent bankrupt after nearly 75% of its budget was spent on unionized police and firefighters!

And despite a $26 billion state budget deficit, out-of-control public sector union bosses aren’t shouldering cuts or taking blame for the problems they’ve caused — they’re threatening strikes!

In other states where union bosses have been granted monopoly bargaining privileges over public sector workers, we’re seeing the exact same thing.

In fact, the Mayor of Lancaster, Pennsylvania recently stated that these struggling cities are “handcuffed” by public sector monopoly bargaining.

Should Big Labor’s allies ram the Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill into law, this kind of dysfunction could be coming to a town or city near you.

Quite simply, passage of the Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill could be the last straw for already struggling communities.

The truth is, passage of this Big Labor power grab would mean:

  • State and local governments — who are already experiencing budget shortfalls during these troubled economic times — will be forced to pay the salaries and perks of union bosses.
  • In the Post Office alone, taxpayers have been forced to fund over 1.75 million hours of union organizing.
  • Small communities that depend on volunteer police and firefighters for their safety will be forced to do without them.
  • Or communities will have to deal with mammoth tax hikes to pay for union boss-controlled public safety workers.
  • The Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill will do nothing to stop crime or make our communities safer.
  • On the contrary, forcing police and firefighters under the control of power-mad union bosses tends to drive many of the best men and women out of their jobs.

Think your town or city could “take a pass?”  Think your local and state public officials could stand up to the federal government and refuse to go along?

Under the provisions of S. 3194, no matter what your state and local officials say, every police officer and firefighter in towns and cities across the whole country will ultimately be handed over to union boss control.

And if your town won’t go along with that, the Federal Government will step in and turn over your first responders to Big Labor anyway.

And, of course, history shows us police and firefighter monopoly bargaining also has all too often led to strikes. This legislation could pit honest taxpayers like you against the very people you count on to protect you.

Yes I can support the Employee ‘Forced’ Choice Act (EFCA).

And  reaffirmed my support for this piece of job-killing legislation, declaring that federal agencies would implement Big Labor’s agenda. While I lie and continue to claim out of one side of my mouth that the economy and job creation are my top priorities, in the next breath I state support for legislation that will result in lost jobs and closed businesses. Appearing on CSPAN’s Newsmakers, AFL-CIO boss Richard Trumka promised a vote on EFCA before the end of the year.

While President Obama and Big Labor push forward with EFCA, there are a number of other controversial policy proposals that have gained tractions, such as Project Labor Agreements and the “High Road” Contracting Policy. Learn more about the forced unionization agenda here.

Yes I can pay back my union buddies with Card Check and Police/Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining. My buddy in crime and socialism, Harry Reid has scheduled a vote to cut the heart out of the filibuster and other Senate rules that stopped Big Labor’s power grabs the last two years.

Not only that, Big Labor’s puppet politicians in the Senate are violating established Senate procedure requiring 67 votes for a rule change — and instead are scheming to ram it through with only 51 votes!

I  love Senate Resolution 10, that weakens the filibuster or other Senate rules protecting the minority party.

Big Labor power grabs and Harry Reid are trying to ram through the Card Check Forced Unionism Bill and Police and Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining Bill.

In fact, Big Labor front group “American Rights at Work” is now lobbying to destroy the filibuster for that very reason.

The union bosses and their pro-forced unionism allies in Congress are plotting to cheat and change the rules so they can push through unpopular, dangerous legislation designed to give them more control over American workers and the entire economy.

The filibuster has protected workers and taxpayers from Big Labor power grabs for decades. Had Harry Reid’s rules been in place in the past…

… LBJ would have repealed section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act in 1966 – and with it every state Right to Work Law in the land.

… Jimmy Carter would have rammed George Meany’s Labor Law “Reform” bill into law in 1978, herding hundreds of thousands of workers into unions against their will.

… Bill Clinton’s Construction Forced Unionism legislation would have turnedAmerica’s largest industry into a massive closed union shop.

… And Barack Obama’s Card Check and Police/Firefighter Monopoly Bargaining thank you notes to Big Labor would be further stranglingAmerica’s economy and local first responders today.

The union bosses are putting massive pressure on every Senator to violate two centuries of precedent and destroy the minority party’s ability to block legislation the American people do not want.

Yes I can support and pay back the unions, but what did other Presidents say.

From Thomas Jefferson: “To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical.”

That, in essence, is what the Right to Work principle — that no worker should be forced to join or pay dues to a union as a condition of employment — is all about. Forced unionism denies hardworking Americans the right to refrain from financially supporting organizations they oppose.

But with recent events, we are reminded of another U.S. President’s warnings about the dangers of forced unionism militancy in the government sector.

You see, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has proposed a bill that would give most government employees the Right to Work without having to pay tribute to a labor union.

Last week, teacher union militants held “sick-outs” to abandon their students and storm the capitol, demanding the legislature maintain Big Labor’s stranglehold over taxpayers. Their extreme tactics shut down schools across the state.

Then, union boss-backed Democrats fledWisconsinto prevent the state senate from conducting its session, including debate and a vote on Governor Walker’s bill to diminish union boss control over the state budget.

Anyone who has studied union boss tactics over the years shouldn’t be surprised. Even President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, himself a forced unionism proponent, predicted the devastating consequences of monopoly bargaining in the government sector.

“The employer [of government workers] is the whole people,” FDR wrote in a 1937 letter. Government employees, he continued, have

“the obligation to serve the whole people, whose interests and welfare require orderliness and continuity in the conduct of Government activities. This obligation is paramount. Since their own services have to do with the functioning of the Government, a strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to prevent or obstruct the operations of Government until their demands are satisfied. Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government by those who have sworn to support it, is unthinkable and intolerable.”

The union bosses’ militant tactics inWisconsinin the last week were indeed unthinkable and intolerable. And predictable.

I love the Unions especially the one in WI. So does some of my rowdy friends like this guy from Mass. Massachusetts Democrat Michael Capuano told a crowd: “you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary.”

Yes I can bad mouth the Republican Governor of WI. Late Thursday night, the Wisconsin State Assembly passed Governor Scott Walker’s public-sector union monopoly bargaining reform bill.

The legislation would give most government employees the Right to Work without having to pay tribute to a labor union and take state government out of the hands of Big Labor, and put it back where it belongs – with the taxpayer

For years, government-sector union bosses have built up enormous political power and influence by extracting forced union dues from public employees and getting their own favored candidates elected to state and local government — in effect, putting the union brass on both sides of the bargaining table and leading to fiscal nightmares the taxpayers cannot afford.

A fragile national economy and massive budget gaps across the country inspired grassroots citizens like you to fight back, and in the 2010 elections concerned voters kicked Big Labor-backed incumbents nationwide out of office.

But as we’re seeing inWisconsin, the battle didn’t end with the elections.

Now, pro-forced unionism Democrats in the State Senate continue to hide out inIllinois, shutting down the upper chamber in a desperate attempt to protect the union bosses’ power over the people.

Yes I can support the public sector unions across Americaas the Unions are my rowdy friends. Radical leftists and public employee unions are storming the streets in protest to protect the very policies that have drained state treasuries and crushed taxpayers with oppressive taxation.  Just look at this socialist friend of mine.

The “protests” have featured incendiary rhetoric and hateful imagery, although you won’t hear about these uncivil acts in the “mainstream” media, as the left and public unions have deemedWisconsina hill to die on.

So TAKE THAT AMERICA –  I WON! I will bankrupt America, Americans, children and your granchildren

MY SOCIALIZED Government Controlled HEALTH Care PLAN. MY WAR ON AMERICANS & AMERICA’s BUSINESSES

Mar. 30:  BO shakes hands after signing the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act inAlexandria,Va.

What AM I looking at up there? It is Allah

ObamaCare imposes:

*** Unconstitutional bureaucratic red tape on small businessmen and women, forcing them to the brink of bankruptcy under the boot heel of government; and,

*** The unconstitutional individual mandate, forcing tens of millions of people to purchase health insurance, even if they don’t want or need it; and,

*** Endless federal regulations, driving up the cost of health insurance and in turn the cost of healthcare itself; and,

*** The tyranny of unelected bureaucrats charged with dictating which operations and procedures are covered, who will be treated and who will die.

Yes  I can set aside $105 billion dollars for my beloved ObamaCare. Last week, my colleagues and were shocked and appalled to find a provision in the Obamacare bill which appropriates $105 billion towards its funding- a complete and fraudulent circumvention of the legislative process.

In the bill, instead of following the rules and letting the next Congress go through the appropriations process, Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats appropriated billions of dollars in funding for Obamacare without holding a single hearing, or even allowing Members of Congress a chance to read the bill. I guess this is what Nancy Pelosi meant when she said “we have to pass the bill, so you can find out what is in it.” Even Democrats in Congress were surprised to hear this shocking news.

HEY I WON SO TAKE THAT AMERICA.

YES I love pulling the wool over Americans and it is so easy.

This is what Passage of ObamaCare means:

***  Statist politicians will collect more than $570 BILLION in new taxes on everything from prescription drugs and private insurance plans to medical device manufacturers;

***  Big Government will grow even bigger, as the IRS alone will hire more than 12,000 new employees to “ensure compliance”;

***  The power of politicians and bureaucrats will expand dramatically as they FORCEU.S.citizens to buy insurance as a condition of citizenship and seize unprecedented control over American health care and businesses of every size.

Yes I can lie and deny the charge that the mandate (requiring Americans to buy health insurance or pay a fine) was a tax during an interview with George Stephanopoulos.

Now that several states, including Virginia andMissouri, are fighting back, however, my administration has changed its tune in court.

According to The New York Times, “In a brief defending the law, the Justice Department says the requirement for people to carry insurance or pay the penalty is ‘a valid exercise’ of Congress’s power to impose taxes.”1

Yes I can pack town hall meetings with labor union thugs who severely beat citizens who expressed concerns about my government-run health care plan.

Yes I can lie and say this plan will drive cost down. A report by economic experts at the Health

and Human Services Department said the new health care law will expand insurance but won’t reduce runaway costs.

My health care overhaul law will increase the nation’s health care tab instead of bringing costs down, government economic forecasters concluded Thursday in a sobering assessment of the sweeping legislation. A report by economic experts at the Health and Human Services Department said the health care remake will achieve my aim of expanding health insurance — adding 34 million Americans to the coverage rolls.

But the analysis also found that the law falls short of the my lying twin goal of controlling runaway costs, raising projected spending by about 1 percent over 10 years. That increase could get bigger, however, since the report also warned that Medicare cuts in the law may be unrealistic and unsustainable, forcing lawmakers to roll them back.

The mixed verdict for my signature issue is the first comprehensive look by neutral experts. The report projected that Medicare cuts could drive about 15 percent of hospitals and other institutional providers into the red, “possibly jeopardizing access” to care for seniors.

Yes I can lie and say the new healthcare reform law will lower insurance premiums by 14 percent to 20 percent—thereby making health insurance more affordable for everyone. But if you check the fine print reduced insurance premiums apply only to those who decide they want to keep the low-value, “skimpier” kinds of policies.

The general consensus is that the new law virtually guarantees that health insurance premiums will rise even more—instead of becoming more affordable. The Congressional Budget Office itself stated that insurance premiums for people buying their own coverage would go up by an average of 10 percent to 13 percent.

Based on the forecasts of other analysts, premiums will rise even higher—to the tune of 30 percent to 45 percent. Imagine what YOU would be paying if your insurance premiums increased by that much.

The law cuts Medicare by $500 billion, and 10 million seniors who get their coverage through Medicare Advantage’s private plans (about 22 percent of Medicare enrollees) will be stripped of their coverage… or will have their Medicare benefits reduced.

But that may not matter much because the Obama administration itself has forecast that Medicare—the trust fund that pays hospital bills for elderly Americans—is expected to run out of money in 2017. Many believe that Medicare is already broke now—and that unbeknownst to the American public, the government has begun using the general Federal tax funds to pay for senior citizens’ Medicare benefits.

What’s even more alarming is that according to many sources, the Social Security trust fund, which has been forecasted to completely run out of money in 2037, is already running a deficit. And there’s no telling how long the government will be able to continue providing Social Security benefits and services.

One glaring aspect that’s missing in the new healthcare law is that nothing has been done to fix the double-digit upward spiral in healthcare costs… and that in itself is a recipe for disaster.

What would we do if there comes a time when we can no longer rely on Medicare and Social Security? And what if you’re a senior citizen who’s already SICK … and you have no income to pay for healthcare? What would happen if doctors and hospitals turned you away at the door because they have no assurance they’ll get paid for services that they’ll provide you?

It’s a terrifying thought… but one that every American over the age of 40 must consider and find a solution for.

Wasting tax payers money

Yes I can waste tax payer dollars paying for NPR. Paying millions of dollars so NPR can cover things like cowboy poetry festivals while the nation is $14 trillion in debt is reckless. Yet, funding public broadcasting and cowboy poetry festivals is a priority for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the Senate’s most powerful Democrat. He was on the floor yesterday saying it was “mean spirited” to cut funding for these items.

That’s right. While conservatives are fighting to save the country from bankruptcy, Democrats are fighting to save cowboy poetry.

Americans should not be forced to fund public broadcasting when there are already thousands of private choices for educational and entertainment programming on television, radio, and the Internet.

Urge Your Senators to Defund Public Broadcasting

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which funds NPR and PBS, was originally incorporated as a private, non-profit corporation in 1967, and its first taxpayer subsidy was $5 million. Last year CPB got $420 million from taxpayers and President Obama recently asked for an increase to $451 million.

This is money that should be used to reduce our nation’s debt. Instead it’s being used to pick winners and losers in a highly competitive media environment. It’s also being used to pay lavish salaries.

According to 2009 tax forms, PBS President Paula Kerger received $632,233 in compensation that year while NPR President Emeritus, Kevin Klose, received more than $1.2 million in compensation.

NPR boasts that it only gets 2 percent of its funding from taxpayers and PBS gets about 15 percent, so these programs should be able to find a way to stand on their own.

A new undercover video of outgoing NPR Foundation president, Ron Schiller, surfaced yesterday that has it on the ropes. Besides calling the members of the Tea Party Movement “uneducated” and “racist“, he also admitted that NPR did not need taxpayer money.

Let’s take his advice and pass legislation to defund this biased news organization that is clearly out of touch with the American people. Please contact your senators today and urge them to get government out of broadcasting.

Yes I can give millions of dollars to my friends over at ACORN.

Just weeks after announcing that it would be closing its doors due to bad press and financial concerns, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) continues to show its resolve.

Bertha Lewis, the chief executive officer of the controversial anti-poverty group, was on hand at an appeals court inNew Yorkon Tuesday to continue to fight for the organization’s federal funding, which was stripped by Congress last year in the wake of several voter fraud and tax evasion scandals.

Justice Department attorney Mark Stern argued that Congress had every right to take action against ACORN’s “widespread mismanagement” of resources, and asked the court to temporarily block a judge’s ruling that the funding cut-off was unconstitutional, according to the Associated Press (AP).

Jules Lobel, attorney for the Center for Constitutional Rights, said that the group’s $25 million annual budget was needed to help distressed individuals receive government subsidies to stay in their homes. The three-judge panel has yet to rule on the case.

Yes I can increase national debt. Meanwhile, nearly $5 billion is added to the debt every day as Washington borrows 43-cents out of every dollar it spends. It’s not only unsustainable, it’s unfair – and wrong – to saddle our children and grandchildren with that kind of insurmountable debt.

Yes I can a new $50 billion “stimulus” spending plan while speaking to the unions inWisconsinon Labor Day.

Yes I can lie and say this plan would pump money into road repair, railway construction and runway restoration. The package would “create jobs immediately” as well as “make our economy hum over the long haul.”  WHEN DID WE HEAR THIS BEFORE AMERICA? BIG BROTHER STIMULUS of $787 Billion was to start the economy with SHOVEL READY JOBS”. Never happened did it?

President Obama talks about the budget, Tuesday, April 5, 2011, at the White House inWashington. (AP)

I am such a cry baby when I do not get my way. I am the CRY BABY IN CHIEF. So salute meAmerica.

The impasse between the White House and Congress increasingly looks like it will force the government to shut down by the weekend. WHO IN AMERICA CARES if the Government shuts down? Big deal just look what they have done toAmericain 2 years under OBAMA.

——————————————————————————————————-

I LOVE ILLEGALS

Yes I can pass the DREAM ACT that would cost US taxpayers $6.2 billion a year and ‘crowd out’U.S.students in the classroom. I luv those illegals voting for me. Other American students need to get in the back of the bus.

Yes I can go after Arizonaas an evil state preventing illegals from storming America. The outrageous attack on Arizonaby President Barack Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder continues. But this time, it’s worse! The Obama Administration is encouraging other nations to join forces against Arizona. So far, the Ninth Circuit Court has allowed 11 foreign nations, includingMexico, to join theUnited States’ lawsuit againstArizona.

Yes I can criticize a tough new immigration bill inArizona, calling it “misguided” as I do nothing to protect American citizens from illegals. “Our failure to act responsibly will only open the door to irresponsibility by others”. By this I mean illegals will get arrested and deported before I can pass my amnesty law getting a bunch of voters for me and the other liberal socialist inWashington.

“That includes the recent efforts in Arizona, which threaten to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe,”. Remember I do not like cops and remember I called cops stupid. My basic notion of fairness is letting illegals break the law by being inAmericaillegally and then granting them amnesty so I can get their vote. That is fair in my plan as criminals are good guys and the governor ofArizonais not.

Also remember that I am for “ICE” that means federal agencies must assist local authorities in deporting illegals.

Hey I love the illegals afterall they are criminals breaking the laws ofAmerica. Remember one of my best friends is Bill Ayers a terrorist.

Yes I can mock the governor ofArizonaand say the immigration law was poorly conceived and that Arizona Law Enforcement will harass Hispanics inArizonaby asking them to produce papers which is my code word for “Nazis” are located in Arizona Law Enforcement.

Yes I can loosen up our border withMexicoand to turn millions of Mexican intoU.S.citizens as fast as I possibly can so as to increase my voter base and cement my hold on political power.

Yes I can sue Arizona. My administration first announced on foreign TV its plans to sue state over immigration law. Hey I am in charge and I will do everything and anything I can to stay in power including embezzling billion of dollars from BP and lying that it will be use to help Americans in trouble.

HEY WHITE LADY, I WON. I am the CRY BABY and CHIEF. LET’s be perfectly clear.  I WON!!  I sat in the hate speech church for 20 years and Jeremiah Wright is a good guy. Now you want to have a beer in the garden and maybe we can discuss how to bribe you … convert you to my way of thinking.

Yes I can grant amnesty to 10.8 Million illegals. The Obama administration has been holding behind-the-scenes talks to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security can unilaterally grant legal status on a mass basis to illegal immigrants, a former Bush administration official who spoke with at least three people involved in those talks told FoxNews.com.”

MY War on The US Supreme Court

Yes I can pretend my desire to nominate justices who are in touch with “ordinary Americans.” He specifically mentioned “empathy” in choosing Sotomayor.

Before Kagan’s nomination, I said I wanted someone with a “keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people.”I want a justice who, like retiring John Paul Stevens, “knows that in a democracy, powerful interests must not be allowed to drown out the voices of ordinary citizens.”

The truth is Does Kagan meet the standard?
She may have other qualifications, including her willingness at Harvard to invite conservative scholars to her faculty. But aNew York City girl who attended a prep school, Ivy League colleges and law school, who once barred military recruiters from Harvard’s recruitment office and was an adviser to Goldman Sachs, can’t be characterized as anything close to mainstreamAmerica.

Yes I can get what I wantAmericaand that is the Socialist States ofAmerica.

The Washington Times makes a sound case for opposition to Kagan’s confirmation: “Solicitor General Elena Kagan is too political, too leftist, too inexperienced and too disrespectful towards existing law to be confirmed for the U.S. Supreme Court. …what we now know about her should disturb fair-minded Americans….

Kagan: A Socialist Who Is Hostile Toward The First Amendment?

  Radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh recently said that Kagan exhibits a “hot and bothered passion” for Socialism and this passion is readily seen in Kagan’s Princeton thesis.

     In her own words, she practically weeps over the demise of Socialism in the United States: “In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future… of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness. … Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation. Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force? Why, in particular did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties?”

It is now coming to light that Kagan may also exhibit some hostility toward the First Amendment. According to The Washington Times: “We know she is willing to undercut First Amendment free speech for political purposes. Ms. Kagan argued before the Supreme Court that the law should be read to allow the government to prohibit the publication of political pamphlets. In a nation stirred to its own founding by political pamphlets such as ‘Common Sense’ and ‘The Federalist Papers,’ this is an extremely disturbing position.”

      And, in a 1996 article in the University of Chicago Law Review titled “Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine,” Kagan argues that the government’s motive for banning speech should be ”the most important” factor the Court should consider when determining if such speech bans or restrictions are constitutional.

      In other words, Kagan essentially believes that if the government has a good enough reason to ban speech, then so be it, the Court should defer to the government.

      Kagan’s decision to ban military recruiters from campus while she was the Dean of the Harvard Law School has been widely reported.

      What many DON’T know is that Kagan’s actions were a direct and blatant contradiction of United States law.

      You read that right… a contradiction of United   States law. The Washington Times again: “We know she deliberately ignored the law while at Harvard, and unfairly besmirched our military in time of war. The facts are simple. A law known as the Solomon Amendment made it illegal to keep military recruiters off of college campuses. … Then-Dean Kagan barred the recruiters from campus anyway, thus flouting the law. … Somebody who openly flouts the law should not be one of the law’s ultimate arbiters.”

      But here’s a very interesting twist. According to Senator Jeff Sessions, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Ms. Kagan was perfectly willing to obstruct the U.S. military – which has liberated countless Muslims from the hate and tyranny of Saddam Hussein and the Taliban. But it seems she sat on the sidelines as Harvard created an Islamic Studies Center funded by – and dedicated to – foreign leaders presiding over a legal system that violates what would appear to be her position…. She fought the ability of our own soldiers to access campus resources, but not those who spread the oppressive tenets of Islamic Sharia law. Perhaps her response was guided by campus politics. But…much of her career has been spent actively engaged in liberal politics – not legal practice.”

      Contradiction? … Hypocrisy? … Or, does her support for the Islamic Studies Center simply indicate that Kagan never encountered a liberal cause that she didn’t like?

      Does her seeming contradiction actually indicate, as Senator Sessions says, that she simply values “liberal politics – not legal practice?”

And as Senator Sessions noted, “During her White House years, the nominee was the central figure in the Clinton-Gore effort to restrict gun rights — and as the dramatic 5-4 decision today in McDonald shows, the personal right of every American to own a gun hangs in the balance.

In her 1983 Oxford University thesis, Kagan spelled out what she believed to be the role of judges by writing: “…as participants in public life, judges will have opinions, prejudices, values. Perhaps most important, judges will have goals. … And because this is so, judges will often try to mold and steer the law in order to promote certain ethical values and achieve certain social ends. Such activity is not necessarily wrong or invalid.” [Emphasis added]

      In a 1993 article authored by Kagan for Texas Law Review about former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, for whom she clerked, Kagan wrote that her former boss “allowed his personal experiences and the knowledge of suffering and deprivation gained from those experiences, to guide him,” and that in interpreting the Constitution, Marshall believed the Court must “show a special solicitude for the despised and disadvantaged.” Kagan wrote that such a vision “remains a thing of glory.” [Emphasis added]

      What happened to the idea of the Courts being fair and impartial arbiters of the law?

      But that’s not all. In 2007, Kagan referred to Israeli Judge Aharon Barak as her “judicial hero … the judge who has best advanced democracy, human rights, the rule of law, and justice.”

      If you have never heard of Judge Aharon Barak before, he is the poster child of judicial activism. Perhaps the excerpt below from his book, “The Judge in a Democracy,” will provide you with some insight about Kagan’s “judicial hero.”

 “The judge may give a statute a new meaning, a dynamic meaning, that seeks to bridge the gap between law and life’s changing reality… The statute remains as it was, but its meaning changes, because the court has given it a new meaning that suits new social needs.”

      Does that sound like the role of a judge in the United   States, as envisioned by our Founding Fathers? Is that how Kagan would view her role on the Supreme Court if confirmed?

      According to LifeNews.com, Kagan’s “writings dating back to her college days are filled with accolades for judges who took the law into their hands and twisted it for a desired outcome rather than relying on the people through their elected officials.”

My War on The Internet _ I call it OBAMANET

Yes I can take over the internet that Al Gore developed

OBAMA IS ATTACKING FREE SPEECH FROM ALL ANGLES!

Barack Obama has been President for two years—and during that time we have seen unprecedented government expansion and invasive regulation of nearly every aspect of our lives: guns, land, commerce, healthcare, climate, banks, automobiles, energy and food.

But he’s still not satisfied. My latest target? The Internet.

I am going to get the Internet. I am the greatest President that ever lived Americaand let’s be perfectly clear that I do not care one thing about the US Constitution. I like to call it ObamaNet. Catchy Huh!

Free speech is a threat to the Left, and the Internet is one of the most free mediums available.

That’s why Obama feels it necessary to get involved. Very involved.

On December 21, 2010, the FCC made an unprecedented and unconstitutional power grab by passing the Net Neutrality Act. This Act gives the federal government the ability to REGULATE THE INTERNET and any other interstate communication service they choose, WITHOUT Congressional oversight.

Obama not only wants the ability to control your online identity and the way the Internet works, but he also wants to control HOW YOU ACCESS THE INTERNET.

Look at all the ways Obama and his administration are trying to get their claws into the Internet and other broadcast outlets:

HE IS TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR ONLINE IDENTITY The “National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace” program is designed to give all Americans a “National Internet ID.” It will be run through the Commerce Department, and will require you to have an “ignition key” to the Internet.

 HE IS TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR INTERNET ACTIVITY The “Net Neutrality Act” gives government an Internet “kill-switch” they can use to shut down the information superhighway at any time, for any reason. It also expands FCC control over one of the most powerful realms of free speech.

 HE IS TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR WIRELESS BROADBAND ACCESS On the day that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak stepped down, Obama was in tinyMarquette,Michigan, outlining his plans to “invest” the federal government in Wi-Fi delivery. Right now, 95 percent of the nation has access to broadband wireless—and Obama wants to spend $130 billion raising that number to 98%. Wireless access would cease to be a private enterprise; the government would control access.

HE WANTS THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE BACK Rep. Jim Clyburn, Al Sharpton and others on the Left are calling for reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine. If they succeed, the government will not only have control of content on the radio and television, but they will have control of Internet content, as well. That means they will be able to force websites to post opposing views or face being shut down for good. Liberals believe that conservative speech equals hate speech, so you can bet conservative websites will be among the first targeted for “balanced” views!

HE HAS A COZY RELATIONSHIP WITH GOOGLE Google was caught using their Street Cameras to download private information from citizens, but no investigation was ever launched to find out what data they received or what they did with it. Google CEO Eric Schmidt (who is stepping down in April) is on Obama’s Council of Science and Technology Advisors. Former Google employee Andrew McLaughlin is Deputy Chief Technology Officer for the Obama administration, which means he shapes public policy that affects Google’s rivals in the technology industry.

HE HIRED MARK LLOYD AS FCC DIVERSITY CZAR Lloyd is against free speech. He has praised Hugo Chavez for shutting down private media companies and says, “It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press. This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least blind references to freedom of speech or press serves as a distraction from the critical examination of other communication policies. The purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules [by the government], fines, and regulations, that would promote democratic governance.”

None of these actions is a coincidence; they all add up to Obama and his administration willfully ignoring our Constitution and assuming more government control.

I like this stuffAmerica. Nazism is back and it came to America Thru me BO.

Government is not supposed to be in the business of dictating commerce. But if they regulate it, they can tax it—all under the umbrella of a big, socialist government.

And that’s why you and I need to get involved, as well, and take back some of the control we are losing to these Far-Left “visionaries.”

Quietly, the Obama administration has lined up their chess pieces. Before you know it. THE GOVERNMENT will have control over your Internet identity, control over the Internet itself, AND CONTROL over the way you access it. They can use this control for whatever purposes suit them.

The FCC is directly interfering with our free market system, by giving government bureaucrats power over Internet carriers. The Net Neutrality Act seems to be part of a larger effort by the Obama administration to exert power and speech restrictions over the entirety of the Internet, what you can see when you are on it, and how you access it.

Businesses are doing just fine without the “help” of Obama’s big government. They don’t need the government competing with them for business.

There is no “upside” to this for American citizens. It will inflate government spending even more and create the need for NEW government programs, NEW government regulations and IT WILL RESTRICT THE RIGHTS OF AMERICANS by allowing the government to CONTROL THE INTERNET.

 This is a violation of your rights and of the U.S. Constitution!

The Winners? Obama and The Federal Government

The Losers? The American Taxpayer and The Free Market

YES I CAN TAKE OVER THE INTERNET.

Make no mistake – your habits, your finances, your health, and so many other aspects of your life are subject to a far greater level of scrutiny than most people realize is possible.

Getting yourself ready is important. For example, powerful bureaucratic factions of the central government are furiously jockeying for new funding and authority to control the Internet. Unfortunately, we’re not talking about a relatively benign government-directed technology race such as landing on the moon or curing cancer. Today’s sad equivalent of the 1960s “space race” is a perverse bureaucratic competition to be the first to control emerging modes of communication that dare to function outside the control of politics.

You are probably aware by now that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has established a beach head to turn the Internet into a public utility underWashington’s control. The FCC slapped so-called “net neutrality” strictures into enactment while the country was enjoying its Christmas holiday. (Even when Congress was controlled by the Administration’s own party, it declined to enact net neutrality authority to federal bureaucrats because it was previously considered so extreme.)

A January 25 Washington Post story, “Net Neutrality Complaints Pile Up,” details how politically favored Internet service providers are already brandishing the new net neutrality rules to hamper their more innovative competitors. And who gets to play the all-powerful “referee” in the place of good old fashioned competition? That’s right, Uncle Sam.

Coming Soon: Government-Issued Hall Passes

to Function on the Internet

The government’s unhealthy interest in the Internet is indeed worrisome. Uncle Sam is clearly developing a capability to issue cyber “hall passes,” without which you may ultimately be blocked from commerce on the Internet! Let me get down to more recent actions the government is taking to muck up the Internet’s future development:

The Obama Administration (as well as the usual crowd of politically sophisticated, well-connected, crony capitalists) is pushing a new regulatory scheme, the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace. The core of the plan is for the Commerce Department to issue “trusted” communication certificate through most, if not all,U.S.service providers of the World Wide Web.

The justification of such government-issued digital certificates, the Administration says, is to ensure the “integrity” of financial transactions and communications. This is a step toward both taxation and government control.

Not to worry, White House Cybersecurity Czar Howard Schmidt assures one and all, “I don’t have to get a [government-issued] credential if I don’t want to.” Unfortunately, the unspoken part of this promise is that regulatory authorities – as part of a well-established pattern – are in a position to “encourage” Internet providers to only do business with web surfers who “agree” to accept Uncle Sam’s digital certificates.

Schmidt recently touted the Commerce Department as “the absolute perfect spot” toward creating an “identity ecosystem for the Internet.” It indeed is a very smart political move by the White House to designate the Commerce Department as the lead government agency with authority over the internet! Commerce is by far the least politically controversial agency to establish a federal Internet identification and tracking system – especially as compared to the Department of Homeland Security, the National Security Agency, or the Treasury/IRS!

Commerce Secretary Gary Locke is seeking to lull gullible Republicans by stressing that the feds are only interested in establishing a “voluntary” “trusted-identity” system which businesses and Internet users could utilize to cut down on the need for passwords and to streamline commerce on the Internet.

One Obama Administration supporter on this issue, the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), praises the new plan and dismisses critics as urban-myth spinners.

According to the CDT’s own website, it is Commerce Secretary Locke’s own words which clearly show that the federal government is quietly weaving its own controls into the fabric of the World Wide Web:

“Let’s be clear, we’re not talking about a national ID card. We’re talking about a government controlled system,” referring to the construction of the Internet going forward. Gosh, how reassuring!

A Free-Flowing Internet Becomes a Target of the Political Class

Of course, most members of the political class are on record as saying they “love” the free exchange of ideas on the Internet. Yet President Obama and his all-powerful allies in the federal bureaucracy seem determined to counter what they apparently see as dangers the Internet poses to democracy. Not a joke! Consider a little-noticed presidential comment recently made to graduates atHamptonUniversityinVirginia:

“With Ipods and iPads and Xboxes and PlayStations – none of which I know how to work – information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a means of emancipation. All of this is not only putting new pressures on you; it is putting greater pressures on our country and on our democracy.”

Of course, our Founding Fathers probably would have loved the Internet and its capacity to let like-minded Americans – especially those who believe in Constitutional government – to peaceably assemble, organize, and plan. (Not to mention giving private citizens such as me the opportunity to be a truly independent publisher of critical information.)

Ultimately, a free-functioning Internet is fundamentally incompatible with an all-controlling, intrusive central government. Eventually one or the other is going to prevail.

Great Minds Think Alike?

Mubarak and Obama Both Favor an Internet “Off Switch”?

From its point of view, the political class feels justified in manipulating the Internet’s growth! It’s already clear that the potential of the World Wide Web to create communities of like-thinking individualists beyond the reach of the pro-statist news media is enormous.

Before the Mubarak regime shut down Egypt’s Internet, warnings about the Obama Administration creating an Internet “Off Switch” of its own had been widely dismissed as an urban myth. Yet the facts speak for themselves: In June, a U.S. Senate committee passed a White House backed bill to establish what critics then warned was the equivalent of an Internet “Off Switch”: the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act.

The bill has not been enacted, but it even enjoys some GOP support. Whether or not the overall bill ever passes, its core provisions could eventually be enacted piecemeal, probably through bureaucratic decrees.

Unfortunately, Internet disruption by governments (not just China), as noted in a February 7 Wall Street Journal editorial by Gordon Crovitz, is already well established:

  • Nepalsevered Internet connections when its king declared martial law in 2005.
  • Burmashut down its Web in 2007 in a crackdown on reformers.
  • Bahrain,Uganda, andYemenhave all blocked Web communications during sham elections.
  • In Mubarak’s Egypt, it was Western communications companies that implemented the regime’s Internet shut-down during the early days of the crisis (through what is called an “OpenNet Initiative, in which all private service providers impose a technique known as “just-in-time blocking”).

Meanwhile, if the entire Internet ever crashes, the government is positioning itself to step in decisively.

In that scenario, federal bureaucrats will be able dramatically to advance their agenda to turn the World Wide Web into a publicly controlled utility, one which allows them to track and control people more efficiently.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in FIRE BO NOW. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s